2017
DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.15.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mid-Term Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Far Anteromedial Portal Technique

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using two anteromedial (AM) portals by comparing with short-term follow-up results.Materials and MethodsFifty patients who were treated by ACL reconstruction using a two AM portal technique were evaluated retrospectively. The follow-up period was at least 5 years. The mean follow-up period was 68.5±13.9 months. The mid-term clinical outcomes were compared with short-term (≥12 month… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 7 , 8 , 9 , 16 , 24 , 25 Anatomic placement of the femoral and tibial tunnels is crucial to the success of ACL reconstruction. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 19 Although during ACL reconstruction the anatomic positioning is objectified, the maintenance of the bone integrity of the tunnels created is not always guaranteed. 18 The advantages of the described test are that it is technically straightforward to learn and the surgeon is quickly able to obtain a superior view of patient anatomy to facilitate accurate tunnel integrity evaluation, despite this is not a common complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 7 , 8 , 9 , 16 , 24 , 25 Anatomic placement of the femoral and tibial tunnels is crucial to the success of ACL reconstruction. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 19 Although during ACL reconstruction the anatomic positioning is objectified, the maintenance of the bone integrity of the tunnels created is not always guaranteed. 18 The advantages of the described test are that it is technically straightforward to learn and the surgeon is quickly able to obtain a superior view of patient anatomy to facilitate accurate tunnel integrity evaluation, despite this is not a common complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in clinical and functional results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been observed after anatomic reconstruction is performed. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 For anatomic ACL reconstruction, there is a need to place both femoral and tibial tunnels in the center of the respective footprints, respecting the original anatomy. 1 , 5 Knowledge of the anatomic position of ACL attachments can improve the correct positioning and placement of the tunnel and graft.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While single bundle ACLR is the most preferred procedure, the transportal approach also helps double-bundle ACLR considering the direct access to the ACL femoral footprint and better control over drilling tracks [3]. However, the medial arthroscopic portal for single-bundle ACLR has not been uniformly placed in different studies [4][5][6]. Some authors have advocated for a medial portal close to the patellar tendon [2,7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several types of rotatory instability of the knee joint including posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) due to posterolateral corner (PLC) injury, internal tibial rotatory instability due to anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury, and anteromedial instability. The obliquity of a reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) could also affect rotatory instability and long-term outcome 1) . Therefore, the measurement of rotation is important to evaluate these problems of the knee joint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%