2022
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2020.3042179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mid-Term Simultaneous Spatiotemporal Prediction of Sea Surface Height Anomaly and Sea Surface Temperature Using Satellite Data in the South China Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in Shao et al. (2020), the validity of ocean dynamic model is generally no more than 15 days, this is the issue MCM model wants to address.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As in Shao et al. (2020), the validity of ocean dynamic model is generally no more than 15 days, this is the issue MCM model wants to address.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that as the length of the input time series increases, so does the number of IMFs that EMD can obtain. In the prediction tasks that shown in Figure 2, the CEEMD method needs to decompose 30-day PCs, like Shao et al (2020). In this study, PCs with a duration of 9,496 days from 1 January 1993, to 31 December 2018 will be decomposed and then input the MLP model for training.…”
Section: Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (Ceemd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 2018, Zhang et al [36] used the EEMD-LSTM model to forecast land surface temperature and proved the hybrid model is superior to the signal neural network. Shao et al [37] combined the empirical orthogonal function of multivariate, CEEMD, and multilayer perceptron to forecast SST considering the correlation of different variables in the real marine environment. In 2019, Wu et al [38] used the CEEMD-BP model to forecast SSTA and proved that the prediction result of the CEEMD-BP outperforms EEMD-BP, but this conclusion is not absolute.…”
Section: >mentioning
confidence: 99%