2005
DOI: 10.1080/17453670510041411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mid-tibial distraction osteogenesis redistributes bone blood flow

Abstract: Background Distraction osteogenesis can be used for the treatment of osteomyelitis and nonunion, conditions thought to benefit from increased blood flow in the bone tissue of the distracted limb. We have questioned whether such an increase occurs, and investigated the spatial distribution of bone blood flow after distraction osteogenesis.Methods The tibiae of 8 rabbits were lengthened 10 mm by a standard mid-tibial distraction osteogenesis procedure. 2 weeks into the consolidation phase, the bone and soft tiss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that the increase in the vascularization in limbs submitted to distraction osteogenesis [26,28,41,43,44] reaches levels up to nine times higher than the contralateral side and that compression over fibrous connective tissue occupying the docking site at the end of distraction induces ischemia. We hypothesize that the ischemia of the fibrous cap stimulates the vascularization, whose increase is also induced by the distraction stimulating the vascular invasion of the docking site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the increase in the vascularization in limbs submitted to distraction osteogenesis [26,28,41,43,44] reaches levels up to nine times higher than the contralateral side and that compression over fibrous connective tissue occupying the docking site at the end of distraction induces ischemia. We hypothesize that the ischemia of the fibrous cap stimulates the vascularization, whose increase is also induced by the distraction stimulating the vascular invasion of the docking site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%