2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2016.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mid-upper arm circumference is associated with biochemically determined nutritional status indicators among adolescent girls in Central Mozambique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta-analysis compiling 17 datasets from Africa, Asia, and North and South America found a strong positive correlation between MUAC and BMI and that MUAC cut-offs in the range of 23.0 to <25.5 cm could serve as appropriate indicators for low BMI, while a MUAC < 24.0 cm meets the criteria across various subpopulations when assessed against BMI < 18.5 kg/m 2 [13]. The strong positive correlation between MUAC and BMI and its role as a valuable anthropometric marker and nutritional status indicator for undernutrition was confirmed in studies among adolescent girls in Central Mozambique and adults in Bangladesh [14,15]. A multi-crosssectional study in Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, and Tanzania (n = 1463) revealed a high incidence of overweight and obesity, which far surpassed and replaced undernutrition as a public health problem in both rural and urban areas [16]; therefore, MUAC and appropriate MUAC cut-offs could be a simple and sensitive tool for early detection of at risk-groups of overweight as well as underweight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A meta-analysis compiling 17 datasets from Africa, Asia, and North and South America found a strong positive correlation between MUAC and BMI and that MUAC cut-offs in the range of 23.0 to <25.5 cm could serve as appropriate indicators for low BMI, while a MUAC < 24.0 cm meets the criteria across various subpopulations when assessed against BMI < 18.5 kg/m 2 [13]. The strong positive correlation between MUAC and BMI and its role as a valuable anthropometric marker and nutritional status indicator for undernutrition was confirmed in studies among adolescent girls in Central Mozambique and adults in Bangladesh [14,15]. A multi-crosssectional study in Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, and Tanzania (n = 1463) revealed a high incidence of overweight and obesity, which far surpassed and replaced undernutrition as a public health problem in both rural and urban areas [16]; therefore, MUAC and appropriate MUAC cut-offs could be a simple and sensitive tool for early detection of at risk-groups of overweight as well as underweight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…35 Among adolescent girls in Mozambique, MUAC correlated with levels of haemoglobin, serum albumin, ferritin, zinc, and plasma retinol. 36 For predicting mortality among adults in a famine setting, the AUC was statistically significantly greater for MUAC (0.71) than for body mass index (0.57). 37 In this study we did not aim to examine the ability of MUAC to detect overweight and obesity, and these were rare in our validation datasets.…”
Section: Growth Referencesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…MUAC was measured on the left arm. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from weight and height measured at admission; cut-offs for underweight (<18.5 kg/m 2 ), overweight (≥25 kg/m 2 ) and obesity (≥30 kg/m 2 ) were used according to WHO and FANTA instructions [ 25 , 26 ]. MUAC cut-offs demonstrating underweight at <24 cm, overweight at ≥30 cm and obesity at ≥33.5 cm were set based on suggestions from recent studies [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%