2021
DOI: 10.3171/2021.7.focvid21124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middle cranial fossa approach for acoustic neuroma

Abstract: The middle fossa approach for the resection of small acoustic neuromas is a viable, but underutilized treatment modality with the goal of hearing preservation. The authors aim to demonstrate this approach and its nuances through this video presentation. A 38-year-old man presented with an incidentally discovered small, intracanalicular acoustic neuroma that was initially observed, but growth was noted. The patient had good hearing, and therefore a hearing preservation approach was offered. A gross-total resect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both authors are aware of potential risks-damaging the posterior semicircular canal and stapedius muscle. It may seem that the experience gained by drilling for blue line of anterior semicircular canal during middle fossa approach for vestibular schwannoma resection or vestibular neurectomy may be of use when practicing RFA [34]. When a surgeon wants to prevent an accidental damage, the main objective is to find posterior semicircular canal and to expose its blue line [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both authors are aware of potential risks-damaging the posterior semicircular canal and stapedius muscle. It may seem that the experience gained by drilling for blue line of anterior semicircular canal during middle fossa approach for vestibular schwannoma resection or vestibular neurectomy may be of use when practicing RFA [34]. When a surgeon wants to prevent an accidental damage, the main objective is to find posterior semicircular canal and to expose its blue line [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%