2011
DOI: 10.1515/bmt.2011.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middle ear of human and pig: a comparison of structures and mechanics

Abstract: The anatomy investigated presented itself as highly comparable to that of the human. Differing from literature, no fourth ossicle could be found. The porcine dimensions and lever ratios determined match the humans far better than those of all established animal models. The obtained transfer function was congruent to the human one. This underlines the suitability of the pig as an animal model for middle ear implants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the situation in hamster or New Zeeland rabbit (Kurtul et al, ), where the rostral process is slightly developed, in chinchilla , this process is extended, being in fact the most developed part of the malleus. Contrary to this state, the neck of the malleus is almost indistinguishable in chinchilla as in pig, rat and mouse (Hoffstetter et al, ; Mohammadpour, ) where this sector is quite elongated and clearly defined. For the measurement of the lever arm of the malleus, we note again a 10%–13% lower value than the ones published earlier (Vrettakos et al, ; Wang & Gan, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike the situation in hamster or New Zeeland rabbit (Kurtul et al, ), where the rostral process is slightly developed, in chinchilla , this process is extended, being in fact the most developed part of the malleus. Contrary to this state, the neck of the malleus is almost indistinguishable in chinchilla as in pig, rat and mouse (Hoffstetter et al, ; Mohammadpour, ) where this sector is quite elongated and clearly defined. For the measurement of the lever arm of the malleus, we note again a 10%–13% lower value than the ones published earlier (Vrettakos et al, ; Wang & Gan, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Data related to the detailed anatomy of the auditory ossicles are relatively limited. A few elements were reported in case of birds (Mills, ), different rodents (Kerber & Sánchez‐Villagra, ; Kurtul et al, ; Lee, Park, Kang, & Choung, ; Li, Gao, Ding, & Salvi, ; Maier, Tröscher, & Ruf, ; Martins et al, ; Mohammadpour, , ; Şanlı, Sedat, & Oztürk, ), humans (García‐Real, Kass, Sturges, & Wisner, ; Isaacson, ), swine (Gurr, Kevenhörster, Stark, Pearson, & Dazert, ; Hoffstetter et al, ; Pracy, White, Mustafa, Smith, & Perry, ), miniature pigs (HaiJin et al, ), sheep (Ayres Seibel, Lavinsky, & Preto De Oliveira, ; Simaei, Soltanalinejad, Najafi, & Shalizar Jalali, ), chinchilla (Vrettakos, Dear, & Saunders, ; Wang & Gan, ), cat (Beck, Kilchling, & Meyer‐Lindenberg, ; Seifert et al, ), dog (Berghes, Parvu, Cucoanes, & Cuca, ) and wolf (Gürbüz et al, ), badger (Rozen‐Rechels, Peigné, Germain, & Ladevèze, ), horse (Blanke, Aupperle, Seeger, Kubick, & Schusser, ), donkey (Awal et al, ), common degu (32) or other subterranean cavimorphes (Argyle & Mason, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The donkey has been the chosen one for the present research as experimental animal, many authors tried to apply that among the domestic animals, Lavinsky & Goycoolea (1997) a &b in sheep, Pracy et al (1998) in pig, in sheep, in human and sheep, Zirkle et al (2007) and Gurr et al (2009) in pig. Mean while others compared the middle ear of animals to human Hoffstetter (2011) in human in pig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pigs share similarities with humans, especially in terms of the size and shape of the middle and inner ear. Thus, pigs are gaining popularity as an animal model for research in otology (Hoffstetter et al 2011;Yi et al 2014). However, to date no studies have been done on the development of stria vascularis in pigs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%