1993
DOI: 10.1086/461734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middle Level School Reform: The Rhetoric and the Reality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twenty-six percent of these teachers, interestingly, do not feel that they successfully teach all of the students in their classrooms. Responses to the MSCIS did not reveal the reasons of this discrepancy, but the researchers speculate that this lack of efficacy on the part of the teachers may stem from their lack of specific training for teaching at the middle level, a situation that can improve with strong, informed leadership (Lipsitz, 1984), additional targeted professional development, and rigorous initial teacher preparation (Clark & Clark, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-six percent of these teachers, interestingly, do not feel that they successfully teach all of the students in their classrooms. Responses to the MSCIS did not reveal the reasons of this discrepancy, but the researchers speculate that this lack of efficacy on the part of the teachers may stem from their lack of specific training for teaching at the middle level, a situation that can improve with strong, informed leadership (Lipsitz, 1984), additional targeted professional development, and rigorous initial teacher preparation (Clark & Clark, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This began with the introduction of the first junior high schools in the early 1900s, which were developed as a means of improving educational quality and rigor that were lacking in existing elementary (K-8) schools (Clark and Clark 1993). The 1960s ushered in a backlash against the junior high structure, with educators and reformers critiquing junior high schools as impersonal institutions that simply mimicked the educational patterns observed in high schools.…”
Section: Limitations Of Existing Research and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rappahannock, Warren, Falls City Public Schools, and Manassas City were also eliminated from the study because these districts did not follow the middle school organization, grades 5 to 8 or 6 to 8, configurations defined by Clark and Clark (1993). Madison and Orange County used a 4 × 4 block schedule and were eliminated.…”
Section: The Study Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two Fairfax schools, Glasgow and Holmes, were used for the study; the remaining schools in Fairfax were omitted because of the grade organization, seven through eight. Rappahannock, Warren, Falls City Public Schools, and Manassas City were also eliminated from the study because these districts did not follow the middle school organization, grades 5 to 8 or 6 to 8, configurations defined by Clark and Clark (1993). Madison and Orange County used a 4 × 4 block schedule and were eliminated.…”
Section: The Study Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%