2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3232711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middle Managers, Personnel Turnover and Performance: A Long-Term Field Experiment in a Retail Chain

Abstract: In an RCT, a large retail chain's CEO sets new goals for the managers of the treated stores by asking them "to do what they can" to reduce the employee quit rate.The treatment decreases the quit rate by a fifth to a quarter, lasting nine months before petering out, but reappearing after a reminder. There is no treatment effect on sales.Further analysis reveals that treated store managers spend more time on HR and less on customer service. Our findings show that middle managers are instrumental in reducing pers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Section 4.1 compares the impact of these treatments to our results. Controlling for a store's treatment status in Friebel et al (2018) does not affect any of our results.…”
Section: Study Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Section 4.1 compares the impact of these treatments to our results. Controlling for a store's treatment status in Friebel et al (2018) does not affect any of our results.…”
Section: Study Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…15 Beyond the information provided, workers in R50, R90, and R120 received e15 after the referral was hired to provide an immediate reward. The remainder of e50, e90, or e120 (i.e., an additional e35, e75, e105) was paid if the referrer and referral reducing turnover (Friebel et al, 2018). Section 4.1 compares the impact of these treatments to our results.…”
Section: Study Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The pre-RCT period is 2014m2-2015m10 (excluding 2015m11 since the RCT began midway through that month). The two treatments from Friebel et al (2018) are also balanced across the treatments here, with p-values of 0.87 (column 6) and 0.61 (column 8) for one treatment and 0.77 (column 6) and 0.82 (column 8) for the other treatment. * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% Notes: Standard errors clustered at the store level.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and External Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Friebel et al (2018) is the only field experiment we know of that attempts to manipulate turnover rates. While their intervention did reduce turnover, it also caused a re-allocation of middle managers' time that directly affected productivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%