2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middle-range theories of land system change

Abstract: General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
275
2
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 417 publications
(346 citation statements)
references
References 225 publications
(212 reference statements)
4
275
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…while we find that a large share of reforestation in post-transition countries is offset by deforestation embodied in imports, we cannot conclude that these imports were caused by the increased domestic reforestation efforts (leakage proper [53]). The forest transitions literature typically makes a distinction between an economic development path to forest transitions (economic growth pulling labor out of agriculture, leading to abandonment of agricultural land and forest regeneration) and a forest scarcity path (reforestation occurring in response to extensive negative impact of forest loss) [6,53]. Likely, the causality is different depending on the forest transition path: where the forest transition is prompted by forest scarcity, increased imports may be a way of facilitating a local or national forest transition (i.e.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…while we find that a large share of reforestation in post-transition countries is offset by deforestation embodied in imports, we cannot conclude that these imports were caused by the increased domestic reforestation efforts (leakage proper [53]). The forest transitions literature typically makes a distinction between an economic development path to forest transitions (economic growth pulling labor out of agriculture, leading to abandonment of agricultural land and forest regeneration) and a forest scarcity path (reforestation occurring in response to extensive negative impact of forest loss) [6,53]. Likely, the causality is different depending on the forest transition path: where the forest transition is prompted by forest scarcity, increased imports may be a way of facilitating a local or national forest transition (i.e.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Moreover, it is important to note that our analysis does not say anything about causality: i.e. while we find that a large share of reforestation in post-transition countries is offset by deforestation embodied in imports, we cannot conclude that these imports were caused by the increased domestic reforestation efforts (leakage proper [53]). The forest transitions literature typically makes a distinction between an economic development path to forest transitions (economic growth pulling labor out of agriculture, leading to abandonment of agricultural land and forest regeneration) and a forest scarcity path (reforestation occurring in response to extensive negative impact of forest loss) [6,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondly, our case study includes farms in regions that were cleared in many cases decades ago. It is unclear however whether smallholder farmers would engage in intensification practices in a context of abundant forests, and of low labor and capital availability [35,56]: the average investment required for the SPSs technologies for these farms were 911 $ ha −1 , 3277 $ ha −1 and 1522 $ ha −1 for the IPs, FB and ST, respectively [57]. Additionally, in an opposite context of financial support, a deforestation rebound effect could take place, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpreting regional context requires greater attention to 'the cultural aspects of landscape patterns' and their effect on 'decision-making processes as well as the institutions and governance structures involved in land management' (Rounsevell et al 2012). Our approach is founded on existing scholarship that examines how environmental signals (feedback from the environment) are incorporated into decisionmaking through perception, interpretation and valuation (Verburg 2006, Lambin and Meyfroidt 2010, Meyfroidt 2013, Meyfroidt et al 2018.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%