2005
DOI: 10.1080/19404476.2005.11462025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middle School Students’ Perceptions of Social Dimensions as Influencers of Academic Engagement

Abstract: This qualitative study investigates rural middle school students' perceptions of academic engagement. Participant-produced drawings (Kearney & Hyle, 2003), integrated with a series of semi-structured interviews (Patton, 2002), served as the primary data collection techniques. Twenty middle school students participated, stratified for socioeconomic status, grade level, gender, history of academic achievement, and school type. Findings indicate students strongly perceived the social conditions of the classroom a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The peer culture in low-income classrooms also often militates against achievement, discouraging the students with academic potential (Garcia-Reid, Reid, & Peterson, 2005;Rycraft, 1991). By the time low-income, high-ability students reach middle school, many have become invisible, underachieving relative to their ability and unable or unwilling to draw attention to their potential (Bishop & Pflaum, 2005;Cross, Coleman, & Terhaar-Yonkers, 1991;Van Tassel-Baska & Stambaugh, 2007).…”
Section: Finding Low-income Students With Advanced Academic Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peer culture in low-income classrooms also often militates against achievement, discouraging the students with academic potential (Garcia-Reid, Reid, & Peterson, 2005;Rycraft, 1991). By the time low-income, high-ability students reach middle school, many have become invisible, underachieving relative to their ability and unable or unwilling to draw attention to their potential (Bishop & Pflaum, 2005;Cross, Coleman, & Terhaar-Yonkers, 1991;Van Tassel-Baska & Stambaugh, 2007).…”
Section: Finding Low-income Students With Advanced Academic Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important reason youth may be motivated to learn and experience success in school is teacher care (Ryan & Patrick, 2001;Schmakel, 2008;Wentzel, 1997), especially in ethnically diverse, urban schools (Adkins-Coleman, 2010;Bishop & Pflaum, 2005;Murray, 2009). However, not all teachers purposefully build close, high-quality relationships.…”
Section: Teacher Practices That Support Young Adolescent Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learner-centered instruction, including active, hands-on learning and individualized learning supports, may help students learn in authentic and interactive ways and support student motivation (APA, 1997; Bishop & Pflaum, 2005;Eccles & Roeser, 2011;Meece et al, 2003;Schmakel, 2008).…”
Section: Instructional Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, explorations of student motivation (e.g., Bishop & Pflaum, 2005;Cushman & Rogers, 2008;Daniels, 2011) have yielded similar insights and appear to be worthy of continued discussion as administrators work to create positive teaching environments. Following are practical suggestions for teachers and administrators that are based on the interview themes and supported by the motivation research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%