2016
DOI: 10.2110/palo.2015.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middle to Upper Devonian Skeletal Concentrations From Carbonate-Dominated Settings of North America: Investigating the Effects of Bioclast Input and Burial Rates Across Multiple Temporal and Spatial Scales

Abstract: Skeletal concentrations, defined here as deposits ! 10% by volume invertebrate bioclasts (. 2 mm), are very common targets of paleobiological investigations. The complex interactions among biological, taphonomic, and physical environmental processes influence the type and quality of information that can be drawn from these paleobiological repositories. This study examines the relative roles of bioclast input and burial on the formation of Middle-Upper Devonian skeletal concentrations from tropical carbonate-do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 84 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, variations in the taphonomic signature of siliciclastic fossiliferous deposits may be driven primarily by sedi mentary inputs and depositional processes (i.e., R sediment model of Kidwell, 1985Kidwell, , 1986, or by variations in the production rate of biogenic skeletal remains (i.e., the R hardpart model; see Toma sových et al, 2006). This assumption has been successfully corroborated by qualitative and quantitative studies of several Quaternary (and older) siliciclastic successions around the globe (Kidwell, 1989;Meldahl, 1990;Abbott et al, 2005;Cantalamessa et al, 2005;Toma sových et al, 2006;Scarponi and Kowalewski, 2007;Zecchin and Caffau, 2011;Avila et al, 2015;Scarponi et al, 2016;Brady, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Consequently, variations in the taphonomic signature of siliciclastic fossiliferous deposits may be driven primarily by sedi mentary inputs and depositional processes (i.e., R sediment model of Kidwell, 1985Kidwell, , 1986, or by variations in the production rate of biogenic skeletal remains (i.e., the R hardpart model; see Toma sových et al, 2006). This assumption has been successfully corroborated by qualitative and quantitative studies of several Quaternary (and older) siliciclastic successions around the globe (Kidwell, 1989;Meldahl, 1990;Abbott et al, 2005;Cantalamessa et al, 2005;Toma sových et al, 2006;Scarponi and Kowalewski, 2007;Zecchin and Caffau, 2011;Avila et al, 2015;Scarponi et al, 2016;Brady, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%