1991
DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(91)90114-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Midlatency auditory evoked responses: differential effects of a cholinergic agonist and antagonist

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
63
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings (Jääskel-äinen et al 1999) and those of Buchwald et al (1991) have suggested that brain acetylcholine plays an important role in the generation of the Pa response. In these studies, the Pa/Pam amplitude was enhanced by muscarine receptor antagonist scopolamine, and was reduced by the agonist physostigmine.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Our findings (Jääskel-äinen et al 1999) and those of Buchwald et al (1991) have suggested that brain acetylcholine plays an important role in the generation of the Pa response. In these studies, the Pa/Pam amplitude was enhanced by muscarine receptor antagonist scopolamine, and was reduced by the agonist physostigmine.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…We conclude that there are some indications that P50 amplitudes may be attenuated following donepezil treatment, but the effects of donepezil on P50 amplitudes in MCI need to be further investigated given the mixed results, which are likely due to the small number of subjects in the MCI subgroups. Previous studies have shown that acetylcholine can modulate the activity of auditory cortex (Buchwald et al, 1991;Metherate, 2004). There is also an increase in cholinergic enzyme activity in certain cortical regions in MCI (Dekosky et al, 2002).…”
Section: Cholinergic Transmission and The Long-latency P50 Component mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…At the same time, the values of the three parameters -RA, PA and Do in the anxiety group were higher than in the asthenia group. Thus, the RA index in the anxiety group (59.3 ± 2.13) was greater (U [15], [16] = 0; p <0.001) than in the asthenia group (49.7 ± 2.12). PA in the anxiety group (46.7 ± 3.81) also exceeded (U = 25, p <0.001) the values of the The indices of psychological testing of asthenia and anxiety groups showed signi icant exceeding values (U values from 0 to 25, p<0.001) of RA, PA, Ds, Do and Ao of both groups relative towards the comparison group (Fig.…”
Section: The Results Of Psychological Testing In Asthenia and Anxietymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The latent periods of the P3 component and in the asthenia group are 312.0 ± 33.16 ms (U = 50; p <0.001), and in the anxiety group 320.0 ± 34.61 ms (U [15]; [16] = 87.5, p <0.05) were lower than in the CG (368.3 ± 37.15 ms) (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Erp In Asthenia and Anxiety Groups Compared To The Control Gmentioning
confidence: 99%