2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2011.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Midsagittal brain shape correlation with intelligence and cognitive performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Informed consent was obtained. We have previously reported other brain/intelligence results using this sample (Bruner, Martín-Loeches, Burgaleta, & Colom, 2011;Colom et al, 2009).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Informed consent was obtained. We have previously reported other brain/intelligence results using this sample (Bruner, Martín-Loeches, Burgaleta, & Colom, 2011;Colom et al, 2009).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Finally, we tested whether precuneal morphological variation is correlated with a set of psychometric scores tapping cognitive functions of increased complexity, namely processing speed, attention control, working memory, and intelligence. We have previously published analyses of correlation between brain geometry and standard cognitive variables (Bruner et al, 2011b;Martin-Loeches et al, 2013). Generally, most cognitive factors do not display patent associations with brain form, although some of them (attention control and processing speed, in particular) may show weak but consistent relationships with shape changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it has been proposed that our species' globular brain shape is related to increased wiring efficiency [Hofman, 1989;Chklovskii and Stevens, 2000;Chklovskii et al, 2002], Bruner et al [2011] found only subtle correlations between midsagittal brain shape and performance in a series of different cognitive tests among human young adults. Brain shape per se is probably even less correlated to any measure of intelligence than brain size [Gunz et al, 2012;Neubauer and Hublin, 2012] but internal brain organization, such as neural pathways and cytoarchitecture, is interpreted to be very important [Schoenemann et al, 2000;Schmithorst et al, 2005;Shaw et al, 2006;Luders et al, 2009;van Leeuwen et al, 2009].…”
Section: The Evo-devo Approach Of Paleoneurologymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Only recently, geometric morphometric techniques have been used to quantify and analyze global brain shape itself [Bruner et al, 2010[Bruner et al, , 2011Gomez-Robles et al, 2013], but also Euclidean distance matrix analysis, which analyzes interlandmark distances, has been used [Richtsmeier et al, 2006;Aldridge, 2011]. MRI scans are used to obtain coordinate data of landmarks defined on specific brain sulci and structures, and thereby the dimensions and shape of different brain regions can be delineated and quantified.…”
Section: Of Digital Data and Three-dimensional Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%