“…We emailed 13 authors, of whom 6 responded: 3 responses indicated that individual patient data could not be provided for subgroup analysis, [30][31][32] 1 response caused exclusion of the study owing to inadequate follow-up, 33 1 response allowed inclusion of the study after removal of data for 2 patients with concomitant injuries, 34 and 1 response provided individual patient metadata, allowing inclusion of patients into subgroup analysis. 35 Data were collected on 805 procedures from a total of 35 papers 25,[28][29][30][31][32] (Table 3). The review included 43 patients from 4 studies involving intentional fibrous nonunion type procedures, 32,41,48,61 391 patients from 14 groups involving capsulodesis, [29][30][31]39,43,47,51,52,54,55,59,60,62,63 319 patients from 12 groups involving tenodesis techniques 25,30,34,36,37,40,[44][45][46]50,53,58 and 51 patients from 4 groups using bone-tissue-bone techniques.…”