2014
DOI: 10.1002/2014ja020304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Midterm periods of solar filaments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A period of ∼1.2 years is found in our study which can be inferred to be the ∼1.3 years periodicity observed in geomagnetic activity (Mursula & Zieger 2000), oscillation in Solar wind (Richardson et al 1994), velocity of solar wind (Li et al 2017), solar filament (Zou & Li 2014) and rate of internal rotation near the base of the solar convection layer (Howe et al 2000). On other hand ∼1.76 years period is related to the ∼1.7 years periodicity observed in the intensity of cosmic ray (Kato et al 2003), velocity of solar wind (Li et al 2017) and solar filament (Zou & Li 2014). These periods are also considered for understanding the behavior of magnetic field emergence and magnet-ic cycle of the Sun (Valdés-Galicia et al 1996).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A period of ∼1.2 years is found in our study which can be inferred to be the ∼1.3 years periodicity observed in geomagnetic activity (Mursula & Zieger 2000), oscillation in Solar wind (Richardson et al 1994), velocity of solar wind (Li et al 2017), solar filament (Zou & Li 2014) and rate of internal rotation near the base of the solar convection layer (Howe et al 2000). On other hand ∼1.76 years period is related to the ∼1.7 years periodicity observed in the intensity of cosmic ray (Kato et al 2003), velocity of solar wind (Li et al 2017) and solar filament (Zou & Li 2014). These periods are also considered for understanding the behavior of magnetic field emergence and magnet-ic cycle of the Sun (Valdés-Galicia et al 1996).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Mei et al (2018) also found these periods in 10.7 cm solar radio flux as well as sunspot area data and suggested that the observed periods may be due to the flow of magnetic flux generated inside the Sun from the Sun's photosphere to corona. Zou & Li (2014) suggested that the ∼1.2 years period may be one of the sub-harmonics 1 8 × 11 = 1.3 of the dominant 11 years solar cycle. Li et al (2017) also pointed out that the lifetime of the equilateral dipole field of the Sun is very close to the period around ∼1.76 years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other periodicities, from several to hundreds of days-for example, 13.5, 120, and 276 days-as well as the annual period, have also been determined (Rybák & Dorotovič 2002;Bai 2003;Zou & Li 2014;Kolotkov et al 2015;Xiang & Kong 2015;Deng et al 2016;Chowdhury et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A lot of studies have been reported that the 1.3 and 1.7 year periodicities indeed exist in the solar interior, the atmospheres of the Sun, and the interplanetary space (e.g., Howe et al 2000;Singh et al 2012;Zou & Li 2014;Kudela et al 2002;Chowdhury et al 2013). Furthermore, they are associated with the basic process of solar dynamos, and can be clearly observed in the Sun.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%