Midwifery students’ reactions to ethical dilemmas encountered in outpatient clinics

Abstract

Background: Midwives are required to make ethical decisions with the support of respective codes of professional ethics which provide a framework for decision making in clinical practice. While each midwife should be ethically aware and sensitive to the ever-changing issues within reproduction, few empirical studies have examined the views of student midwives in relation to reproductive ethical dilemmas. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore midwifery students’ reactions to a number of ethical dilemmas relating to women’s experiences of reproductive decision making. Design: A series of focus groups were conducted with midwifery students who were asked to discuss five culturally significant scenarios including issues of knowledge acquisition regarding methods of family planning, removal or insertion of an intrauterine device, and abortion. Setting: A University in Turkey was the setting for this study. Participants: Purposeful sampling was adopted which resulted in five focus groups with a total of 57 midwifery students. Ethical considerations: The study was reviewed and granted formal ethical approval by an ethical committee at the Faculty of Health Science in Atatürk University. The head of the Faculty of Health Science approved the investigation. The participants received both oral and written information about the study and they gave their consent. Results: Five themes were identified from the analysis of the focus group data related to all five scenarios. These themes were ‘the right to information’, ‘choice and protection’, ‘parental rights and welfare of the women’, ‘make a decision’ and ‘women rights and sexual abuse’. Conclusion: This study has shown that while students respected women’s choice, they also expressed great ambivalence in some situations when personal values conflict with dominant societal beliefs and professional ethics. A focus on ethics education to include human rights is suggested as a means to enable students to explore their own social-value judgements, and as a means to limit the possible development of ethical confusion and moral distress.

Nurses’ ethical challenges caring for people with COVID-19: A qualitative study

“… 4 Ethical dilemmas are described as situations that cannot be solved; decisions made between two options may be morally plausible, but are equally problematic due to the circumstances. 5 Ethical conflicts, on the contrary, arise when one is aware of the necessity of proper actions but he or she may have trouble exercising these actions because of certain internal or external factors. 6 Studies have shown that nurses are likely to face ethical challenges on multiple fronts in clinical practice.…”

Defining ethical challenge(s) in healthcare research: a rapid review

“…Within the concept-led definitions (approach 1), the use of a plurality of terms highlights a potential risk of bias, as different readers may interpret these differently. For example, some terms, such as ‘moral dilemma’, have relatively well understood specific meanings for some readers, particularly those with philosophical training [ 104 – 106 ]. The presence in the literature of specific and multiple meanings for some related terms highlights the importance of empirical studies providing a definition of these additional terms alongside their primary definition for ‘ethical challenge(s)’.…”

Operating room nurses’ lived experiences of ethical codes: A phenomenological study in Iran

“…Ethical challenges are complex issues that are not easily resolved. These problems could be new issues, daily issues, or situations that have to be decided among several options [ 3 , 4 ]. The most common ethical challenges in operating rooms are: not sincerely communicating with patients, ignoring patients’ expectations, failure to follow the sterility principles, wrong surgery, refusing of admitting some patients for surgery, failure to receive informed consent from the patients, and incorrect registration of materials used [ 1 ].…”