2022
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Might field experiments also be inadvertent metacommunities?

Abstract: Metacommunity theory predicts that the composition and diversity of a site depend on its characteristics and those of its neighborhood. Dispersal between plots in a field experiment could link responses observed in a focal plot to both its treatment and those of its neighbors. However, the diversity, composition, and treatments of neighboring plots are rarely included in analyses of experimental treatments. We analyzed a spatially gridded grassland nitrogen addition experiment and found that plant species rich… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At a steady state equilibrium, community turnover can still be quite high as communities sample compositions within the steady state distribution (Naselli-Flores et al, 2003;Shoemaker et al, 2020) (Changes between 1992 and 2004 in Figure 2). Multiple factors, including demographic stochasticity, environmental fluctuations, and small-scale spatial heterogeneity (Furey et al, 2022) can yield temporal turnover and variability in community composition at this dynamical equilibrium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a steady state equilibrium, community turnover can still be quite high as communities sample compositions within the steady state distribution (Naselli-Flores et al, 2003;Shoemaker et al, 2020) (Changes between 1992 and 2004 in Figure 2). Multiple factors, including demographic stochasticity, environmental fluctuations, and small-scale spatial heterogeneity (Furey et al, 2022) can yield temporal turnover and variability in community composition at this dynamical equilibrium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, species loss from enhanced local extinction was 2–5 times greater than from reduced colonization. These treatment effects did not, therefore, appear to have influenced richness dynamics in Control plots despite their proximity (Furey et al, 2022). Similar to our findings, changes to the richness of alpine plant communities as a result of fertilization and soil disturbance were driven primarily by extinctions, rather than colonizations, regardless of whether total richness increased or decreased (Olofsson & Shams, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a steady-state equilibrium, community turnover can still be quite high as communities sample compositions within the steady-state distribution (Naselli-Flores et al, 2003;Shoemaker et al, 2020) (Changes between 1992 and 2004 in Figure 2). Multiple factors, including demographic stochasticity, environmental fluctuations and small-scale spatial heterogeneity (Furey et al, 2022) can yield temporal turnover and variability in community composition at this dynamical equilibrium. Crosssystem comparisons could shed light on dynamical equilibria, and how the amount of turnover at an ecosystem's steady-state distribution may depend on species traits (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%