Cerebrovascular neurologic emergencies including ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and migraine are leading causes of death and disability that are frequently diagnosed and treated in the emergency department (ED). Although sex and gender differences in neurologic emergencies are beginning to become clearer, there are many unanswered questions about how emergency physicians should incorporate sex and gender into their research initiatives, patient evaluations, and overall management plans for these conditions. After evaluating the existing gaps in the literature, a core group of ED researchers developed a draft of future research priorities. Participants in the 2014 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference neurologic emergencies working group then discussed and approved the recommended research agenda using a standardized nominal group technique. Recommendations for future research on the role of sex and gender in the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes pertinent to ED providers are described for each of three diagnoses: stroke, SAH, and migraine. Recommended future research also includes investigation of the biologic and pathophysiologic differences between men and women with neurologic emergencies as they pertain to ED diagnoses and treatments.ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2014;21:1403-1413 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine C erebrovascular neurologic emergencies such as ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and migraine are among the most lethal and disabling conditions presenting to the emergency department (ED). We have made great strides in understanding and treating these conditions, and our efforts have led to improved outcomes for these patients. Sex-and gender-based distinctions, however, are only recently becoming clearer, and much work is needed to explain the differences observed between men and women. After a focused review of the current literature on preclinical, clinical, and outcomes differences between women and men, and then the consensus process, we propose a research agenda in the areas of stroke, SAH, and headache/migraine.
METHODSAfter evaluating the current literature, the authors, all emergency medicine (EM) researchers, proposed an agenda for future research. Consensus was reached using an iterative process through the four-part nominal group technique as already described in the executive summary. 1 A multidisciplinary group of participants (EM, critical care medicine, internal medicine, physical and rehabilitation medicine) prioritized the final iteration of themes/questions using the Poll Everywhere Web-based voting method. Descriptive statistics were calculated to tabulate the final list of questions presented below. The proposed research questions were then discussed and voted on by participants in the Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference neurologic emergencies working group (see footnote for listing) at the meeting in May 2014.
STROKE
Epidemiology/OutcomesStroke is the fourth leading ca...