Before and during a debate with one of the authors of this paper, the former chief economist of the IMF Olivier Blanchard argued that a Keynesian "revolution" is needed to avert a future "catastrophe". We critically examine this statement through an analysis of the historical process that we call "law of reproduction and tendency towards capital centralisation". This method leads to a grim prediction: freedom of capital and the connected tendency of capital to centralise jeopardise all the other freedoms and even threaten today's liberal-democratic hegemonic institutions. In the face of this prospect, neither Keynesian policy nor a basic income seem to be enough. The only revolution that may avert a future catastrophe is a redefinition of the most powerful tool in the history of political struggles: a collective planning, subversively regarded as a factor of development of the free social individuality and a new, liberated, human being.We thank the editor of this journal and two anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions. We also thank