1999
DOI: 10.1080/030570799108669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migrant Labour and the Peasantry in the Bechuanaland Protectorate, 1930-1965

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies historically have documented that remittances have been an important source of income for migrant households (Beinart 1980;Leliveld, 1997;Morapedi, 1999;James, 2001). But there are a number of reasons why it might be expected that the incentives for remitting income among migrants in South Africa are weaker now than they were before.…”
Section: The Economic Ties Of Labour Migrantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies historically have documented that remittances have been an important source of income for migrant households (Beinart 1980;Leliveld, 1997;Morapedi, 1999;James, 2001). But there are a number of reasons why it might be expected that the incentives for remitting income among migrants in South Africa are weaker now than they were before.…”
Section: The Economic Ties Of Labour Migrantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, the majority retained access to agricultural resources for crop farming and cattle rearing, and they moved temporarily between their home village and the place of employment. Labourers were primarily recruited from rural households with few or no cattle in the rural areas and many used their savings to buy cattle as they returned home (Morapedi 1999).…”
Section: From Agriculture To Industry and Service Sectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies are divided on the socio-economic impact of labour migration. The dominant argument in the literature is that it causes considerable economic damage in the areas of out-migration, in part by robbing whole generations of energetic young people (Stichter 1985: 31–4; Morapedi 1999: 198–9; Kowet 1978: 86–100) 3 . However, others subscribe to the idea that migrancy did little harm to rural life, arguing that the absence of over half the able bodies from rural routine due to migration brought many concrete benefits to the subsistence economy through remittances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%