Migrant remittances and inequality in Central‐Eastern Europe

Abstract

The impact of remittance flows on growth and income distribution has attracted a great deal of attention, but the theoretical and empirical literature on the relationship between remittances and economic development is far from clear. Although there is wide consensus that foreign remittances can help the receiving households to increase income, consumption and capabilities to cope with socioeconomic shocks, there has been little quantitative research on impacts of remittances on household welfare and poverty. Our paper seeks to fill some of these gaps proposing an empirical analysis of the role of remittances as a tool for reducing inequality and covering households against poverty and social exclusion risks. The empirical analysis focuses on four Eastern European Countries: Slovenia, Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary, and is based on the EU‐SILC (European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions) 2005 data‐set providing for each household information as to the received inter‐household cash transfers and among which regular cash support from households in other countries (i.e. remittances) are included. The results show that remittances are statistically significant in terms of poverty reduction even if their effects are generally smaller than those of welfare transfers. Furthermore, the impact of remittances and welfare transfers differ across the countries considered.remittances, inequality, poverty, O10, O15, O52,

The Impact of Foreign Direct Investments and Remittances on Economic Growth: A Case Study in Central and Eastern Europe

“…A study performed by Giannetti et al [37] in the Eastern states of the European Union (Slovenia, Poland, The Czech Republic and Hungary), demonstrated the existence of the link between remittances and economic growth of the countries of origin. Giuliano et al [38] carried out a study that included 100 developing countries over the period , demonstrating the strong link between remittances and economic growth, the biggest impact being registered in the developing countries that have a lower level of financial sector development.…”

A Johansen Cointegration Test for the Relationship between Remittances and Economic Growth of Japan

“…Workers with versatile skills contribute immensely to knowledge everywhere and these exceptional individual's contributions encompass scientific discoveries and innovation (Kerr et al 2016). The economic impact of remittance flows upon income distribution and growth has generated immense attention; nonetheless, the empirical and theoretical literature on the association between economic growth and remittance in the context of the developed countries is still unclear (Gianneti et al 2009). The existing studies on remittances can be divided into two categories; namely, developing and developed countries.…”

How to Use the EU-SILC Panel to Analyse Monthly and Hourly Wages

“…Therefore, the number of observations decreases if variables affected by this selection process are used. Bulgaria (2006-2009), Germany (2005-2006 3 , Romania (2007-2009) and Malta (2006-2009.…”

“…Except for a comparison of labour income the whole analysis concentrates on the longitudinal files. We use the EUSILC LONGITUDINAL UDB 2009-version-2 of March 2012, EUSILC LONGITUDINAL UDB 2008-version-4 of March 2012, EUSILC LONGITUDINAL UDB 2007-version-5 of August 2011, EUSILC LONGITUDINAL UDB 2006-version-2 of February 2008and EUSILC LONGITUDINAL UDB 2005of February 2008 In addition to the structure of the data, the cross-sectional data and the longitudinal data also differ to some extent in the covered variables. There are some variables in the crosssectional data file that are also of interest for the analysis of labour market transitions and mobility, but they are not included in the longitudinal data sets.…”