Background and Purpose-A cardiac right-to-left shunt (RLS) can be identified by transesophageal echocardiography and transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) with contrast agents and a Valsalva maneuver (VM) as a provocation procedure. This article applies the modalities of these tests detailed in previous studies to a large patient cohort and compares 2 contrast agents (saline and Echovist-300). Methods-Eighty-one patients were investigated by both transesophageal echocardiography and bilateral TCD of the middle cerebral arteries. The following protocol with injections of 10 mL agitated saline was applied in a randomized way: (1) no VM, (2) VM for 5 seconds starting 5 seconds after the beginning of contrast injection, and (3) repetition of the test with VM if the first test with VM was negative. The VM was performed for 5 seconds starting exactly 5 seconds after the beginning of saline injection. Thereafter, the same protocol was repeated with 10 mL Echovist-300 instead of saline. Results-Thirty-one patients had a cardiac RLS. The Echovist-300 investigation disclosed all these 31 shunts, but saline disclosed only 29 of them. Twenty-two had an RLS only in at least 1 of the above TCD tests, some of them even with a considerable shunt volume. Conclusions-Contrast TCD performed with Echovist-300 but not with saline yields a 100% sensitivity to identify transesophageal echocardiography-proven cardiac RLSs. The TCD test should be repeated if negative the first time. This article gives detailed information for the optimization of the contrast TCD technique. Extracardiac shunts detected only during contrast TCD can have a considerable shunt volume and may allow for paradoxical embolism. Key Words: cerebral embolism Ⅲ cerebrovascular disorders Ⅲ foramen ovale, patent Ⅲ ultrasonography P aradoxical emboli of thrombotic material originating from the deep leg or pelvic veins via a cardiac or extracardiac right-to-left shunt (RLS) can cause ischemic stroke. 1,2 Prerequisites for the diagnosis of paradoxical brain embolism are the demonstration of such a shunt, the presence of an embolic pattern of infarction on cerebral imaging, and the absence of competing stroke origins. Other factors such as the performance of a mostly incidental Valsalva maneuver (VM) before the onset of infarction, the demonstration of remnants of the venous thrombosis during crural venous ultrasound or phlebography, concomitant pulmonary embolism, thrombophilia, and other factors predisposing to venous thrombosis additionally support the diagnosis. In very rare cases, echocardiography or autopsy discloses a thrombus trapped in the cardiac RLS and thus unequivocally proves the paradoxical embolism. 3,4 About 30% of the general population show a cardiac RLS, in most cases a patent foramen ovale. Juvenile patients with otherwise not explainable stroke have a much higher cardiac RLS prevalence of Ϸ50%. 5,6 This fact corroborates the importance of paradoxical embolism in stroke origin. Extracardiac shunts, mainly pulmonary ones, can also deliver a substantial...