2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0426.2002.00404.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migration and habitats of diadromous Danube River sturgeons in Romania: 1998-2000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During this 4-year period, flows were lowest during 2001 (when no tagged fish migrated above rkm 45) and highest during 2003 (when all tagged fish migrated above rkm 45). Moser and Ross (1995) found that shortnose sturgeon moved downstream in response to handling, and Kynard et al (2002) reported that tagging stellate sturgeon, A. stellatus, in the Danube River during the spawning migration resulted in a drop-back rate of more than 50% (many returned to the Black Sea). Hall et al (1991) found that the spawning migration for three of ten shortnose sturgeon was interrupted due to capture and tagging.…”
Section: Upstream-spawning Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this 4-year period, flows were lowest during 2001 (when no tagged fish migrated above rkm 45) and highest during 2003 (when all tagged fish migrated above rkm 45). Moser and Ross (1995) found that shortnose sturgeon moved downstream in response to handling, and Kynard et al (2002) reported that tagging stellate sturgeon, A. stellatus, in the Danube River during the spawning migration resulted in a drop-back rate of more than 50% (many returned to the Black Sea). Hall et al (1991) found that the spawning migration for three of ten shortnose sturgeon was interrupted due to capture and tagging.…”
Section: Upstream-spawning Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sandy river bottom dominating the lower part of the Danube River is unsuitable for spawning because of the sturgeon preference of rocky substrate with crevices (Kynard et al., 2002), however the presence of captured juveniles in that area indicates that they represent important sturgeon nursery habitats. Rocky areas rarely occur downstream, and the major rocky areas do not occur until rkm 258 or further upstream.…”
Section: Habitat Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Vassilev (2003), the main beluga spawning sites were at depths of 9–22 m, on a gravel and coarse sandy substrate, with a strong, but ‘soft’ stream, situated between rkm 863 and 755. Sturgeons prefer a moderate water velocity for spawning (Kynard et al., 2002). In the Romanian part of the Danube River, according to Kynard et al.…”
Section: Habitat Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 20th century, world demand for sturgeon meat and caviar has inflated the economic value of sturgeon fishing, with the value of beluga caviar estimated at the US $ 1000 per 100 grams (Suciu et al, 2008). This, together with the development of intense fishing pressure following a lack of fishing controls after the Romanian revolution in 1989 (Kynard et al, 2002) has caused, despite listing in year 2009 of all remaining Lower Danube river species, in Annex II of the Convention on International Trade in Species of Endangered Fauna and Flora (CITES), the sharp decline in recent documented catches of sturgeon. That is why is essential to increase the sturgeon production in aquaculture, in order to diminish the pressure on the wild stocks and to help the restoring of the wild population and to ensure their survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%