2003
DOI: 10.1086/380135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migration and Incomes in Source Communities: A New Economics of Migration Perspective from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

20
371
6
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 460 publications
(399 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
20
371
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mora and Taylor (2005), Taylor et al (2003), or Adams (2005) all find that years of schooling and other human capital variables have a significant positive impact on the decision to migrate. However, the issue of whether migrants positively or negatively select is controversial.…”
Section: Review Of Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mora and Taylor (2005), Taylor et al (2003), or Adams (2005) all find that years of schooling and other human capital variables have a significant positive impact on the decision to migrate. However, the issue of whether migrants positively or negatively select is controversial.…”
Section: Review Of Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The central idea of NELM is that households send out best-suited individuals to gain an income elsewhere. The money migrants remit serves to spread income risks and to increase income and living conditions, and enables them to invest (Stark 1991;Taylor 1999;Taylor, Rozelle, and de Brauw 2003). Although NELM focuses on explaining migration behaviour, we can also derive an alternative interpretation of return migration which challenges conventional hypotheses that postulate a negative association between integration and return migration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These studies have shown three scenarios in the linkages between labor migration and agricultural output: (1) If there is sufficient surplus labor, remittances from family members working in cities allow rural residents to purchase high-quality seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, and other new technology and infrastructure to boost crop yields (Stark and Bloom, 1985;Lucas, 1987;Rozelle et al, 1999;Dustmann and Kirchkamp, 2001;Woodruff and Zenteno, 2001;Brière et al, 2002;Black et al, 2003;Taylor et al, 2003;Taylor and López-Feldman, 2010). (2) In the case of a thin labor market and in the absence of surplus labor, labor withdrawal can reduce the on-farm labor as well as the agricultural output (Lipton, 1980;Clay et al, 1998;Macdonald et al, 2000;Mochebelele and Winter-Nelson, 2000;Holden et al, 2004;Strijker, 2005;Tzanopoulos et al, 2007;Yamada et al, 2007;Beyene, 2008;Brosig et al, 2009;Gray, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several empirical analyses in China find that participation in labor migration fosters household ability to invest on the farm (Rozelle et al, 1999;Taylor et al, 1999Taylor et al, , 2003De Janvry et al, 2005), and case studies on the plain provinces of China show continuous increase of grain output as well as rapid increase of labor productivity (Hao et al, 2013). However, other case studies find that emigration of agricultural laborers has caused the marginalization of agricultural land, which has resulted in arable land abandonment and decrease in labor intensity, thus posing the additional challenge of ensuring food security (Liu and Li, 2006;Chen et al, 2009a;Tian et al, 2009;Xin and Li, 2009;Tian et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%