Migration and stratification

Jasso, Guillermina

doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.03.007

Cited by 79 publications

(80 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…General information on the six surveys is shown in Table 2. Links to the studies' Web sites are included in Table 2 [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Considerations of Methodological Approaches in the Recruitment and Retention of Immigrant Participants

Lopez-Class

Cubbins

Loving³

2015

J. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…General information on the six surveys is shown in Table 2. Links to the studies' Web sites are included in Table 2 [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Considerations of Methodological Approaches in the Recruitment and Retention of Immigrant Participants

Lopez-Class

Cubbins

Loving³

2015

J. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Changes in immigration policy, such as the 1980 Refugee Act, the 1990 Immigration Act, and the Diversity Visa Program have fueled some of the increase (Jasso 2011; Kollehlon and Eule 2003; Logan and Thomas 2012). Migrants enter the United States under an array of legal statutes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The costs of migration were relatively high (Jasso 2011), and networks of co-nationals were more sparse. Those still in the United States have stayed for the long haul and are likely to be relatively more successful than recent arrivals.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Africans in the American Labor Market

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The number of migrants to the United States from Africa has grown exponentially since the 1930s. For the first time in America’s history, migrants born in Africa are growing at a faster rate than migrants from any other continent. The composition of African-origin migrants has also changed dramatically: in the mid-twentieth century, the majority were white and came from only three countries; but today, about one-fifth are white, and African-origin migrants hail from across the entire continent. Little is known about the implications of these changes for their labor market outcomes in the United States. Using the 2000–2011 waves of the American Community Survey, we present a picture of enormous heterogeneity in labor market participation, sectoral choice, and hourly earnings of male and female migrants by country of birth, race, age at arrival in the United States, and human capital. For example, controlling a rich set of human capital and demographic characteristics, some migrants—such as those from South Africa/Zimbabwe and Cape Verde, who typically enter on employment visas—earn substantial premiums relative to other African-origin migrants. These premiums are especially large among males who arrived after age 18. In contrast, other migrants—such as those from Sudan/Somalia, who arrived more recently, mostly as refugees—earn substantially less than migrants from other African countries. Understanding the mechanisms generating the heterogeneity in these outcomes—including levels of socioeconomic development, language, culture, and quality of education in countries of origin, as well as selectivity of those who migrate—remain important unresolved research questions.

show abstract

“…15 For our purposes, and as it relates to the inclusion of a fixed-effect, the data coding correctly places the person into the undocumented sample and then into the documented sample. Using the New Immigrant Survey, Jasso (2011) reports that roughly 40 percent of new legal immigrants in 2003 had some experience of being in the U.S. illegally at some time before attaining legal status. The percentage whose spell of illegality is most likely to have more immediately preceded legalization is about 12 percent (Jasso 2011: Table 6).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Employer Monopsony Power in the Labor Market for Undocumented Workers

Hotchkiss

Quispe-Agnoli

2009

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Abstract: Using matched employer-employee data from the state of Georgia, this paper investigates how differences in wage responsiveness contribute to the determination of observed wage differentials between documented and undocumented workers. Facing fewer employment opportunities, undocumented workers are found to be about 22 percent less sensitive than documented workers to employers' wage adjustments. In addition, this difference in wage responsiveness accounts for 27 percent of the observed within-firm wage differential between documented and undocumented workers. Implications of the results for recent state immigration legislation are discussed. Terms of use: Documents inJEL classification: J42, J61, J2

show abstract

Migration and stratification

Cited by 79 publications

References 41 publications

Considerations of Methodological Approaches in the Recruitment and Retention of Immigrant Participants

Considerations of Methodological Approaches in the Recruitment and Retention of Immigrant Participants

Africans in the American Labor Market

Employer Monopsony Power in the Labor Market for Undocumented Workers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About