1976
DOI: 10.2307/2576177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migration, Community of Origin, and Status Attainment: A Comparison of Two Metropolitan Communities in Developing Societies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most active area of comparative research involved comparisons of national rates of social mobility (see Matras, 1980;Boyd et al, 1981;Jones, 1969a, 1969b;Broom and McDonell, 1974;Garnier and Hazelrigg, 1974;Hansen, 1977;Jones, 1976;Kleining, 1978;McRoberts and Selbee, 1978;Moots, 1976;Pontinen, 1976;Svalastoga, 1965;Svalastoga and Rishoj, 1970;Wesolowski et al, 1978). The proliferation of comparative mobility studies resulted from the increasing number, quality, and comparability of national social mobility tables available for secondary analyses, and also from a series of methodological contributions which steadily increased the sophistication of means of separating structural from other-than-structural components of cross-societal differences in mobility (see Cutright, 1968b;Hauser et al 1975;Hauser, 1977).…”
Section: Cross-national Differences In Social Mobility and Status Attmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most active area of comparative research involved comparisons of national rates of social mobility (see Matras, 1980;Boyd et al, 1981;Jones, 1969a, 1969b;Broom and McDonell, 1974;Garnier and Hazelrigg, 1974;Hansen, 1977;Jones, 1976;Kleining, 1978;McRoberts and Selbee, 1978;Moots, 1976;Pontinen, 1976;Svalastoga, 1965;Svalastoga and Rishoj, 1970;Wesolowski et al, 1978). The proliferation of comparative mobility studies resulted from the increasing number, quality, and comparability of national social mobility tables available for secondary analyses, and also from a series of methodological contributions which steadily increased the sophistication of means of separating structural from other-than-structural components of cross-societal differences in mobility (see Cutright, 1968b;Hauser et al 1975;Hauser, 1977).…”
Section: Cross-national Differences In Social Mobility and Status Attmentioning
confidence: 99%