2002
DOI: 10.1080/13691830120103912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migration in the age of involuntary immobility: Theoretical reflections and Cape Verdean experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
673
0
40

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 730 publications
(726 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
13
673
0
40
Order By: Relevance
“…This gap is also partly due to the fact that neither rational choice models nor structural or network approaches to migration theory can fully account for the tensions between migrants aspirations to migrate and their actual abilities to do so (Carling, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This gap is also partly due to the fact that neither rational choice models nor structural or network approaches to migration theory can fully account for the tensions between migrants aspirations to migrate and their actual abilities to do so (Carling, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It either refers to a kind of "ongoing mobility", a movement across space, involving a set of strategies for undocumented border crossing (Düvell, 2006) or instead to a period of "involuntary immobility" in which migrants are somehow "stuck" in a country against their will (Carling, 2002). Critical voices (Düvell, 2006, De Haas, 2007 have noted that "transit" is a politically laden concept of questionable validity to conceptualise what are probably new, contemporary migratory movements (King, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also reflects a loss of social network, as the group previously allowed them to build trust and community bonds. This culminates in involuntary mobility (Carling, 2002), with a restriction on freedom to physically move perpetuating social immobility (Kaufmann & Montulet, 2008:38;Kronlid, 2008), all of which reflects gendered inequalities of power (Silvey, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th is analytical perspective intends, fi rst, to contribute to the deconstruction of the voiceless refugee and emphasize not only the agency of the displaced (Korac 2009: 8) but also the potentially empowering eff ects of involuntary (im)mobility (Carling 2002;Hammar 2014), as Lubkemann's contribution posits most forcefully. Second, this section insists on moving the focus of displacement studies from the displaced as a population to displacement as a process, as Bjarnesen puts it in his contribution to this issue.…”
Section: Th E Dialectics Of Displacement and Emplacementmentioning
confidence: 99%