2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12960-018-0293-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migration motives and integration of international human resources of health in the United Kingdom: systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies using framework analysis

Abstract: ObjectiveThe aim of this review was to examine the migration motives, the barriers to and facilitators of integration of international dental graduates, compared with nurses and doctors in the United Kingdom.MethodsElectronic databases Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Knowledge and OECD publications were systematically searched for English language publications from January 2000 to January 2017. A total of 31 qualitative studies were selected and quality appraised and meta-synthesis of the qualitative data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Instead of analyzing country of origin as a single indicator or each country characteristic separately, we analyzed a group of potentially explanatory contextual variables previously identified by the United Nations Development Programme (2104). 24 The UNDP report adopts a human development perspective arguing that wellbeing of populations within countries is affected by individual abilities and sociopolitical contexts. A better understanding of how population vulnerability and resilience to overcome associated challenges, from a multidimensional human development perspective, provided deeper analyses of the key factors and policies that explain why some individuals, communities or countries are more resilient to adverse events and respond better to them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 Instead of analyzing country of origin as a single indicator or each country characteristic separately, we analyzed a group of potentially explanatory contextual variables previously identified by the United Nations Development Programme (2104). 24 The UNDP report adopts a human development perspective arguing that wellbeing of populations within countries is affected by individual abilities and sociopolitical contexts. A better understanding of how population vulnerability and resilience to overcome associated challenges, from a multidimensional human development perspective, provided deeper analyses of the key factors and policies that explain why some individuals, communities or countries are more resilient to adverse events and respond better to them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human and social capital variables included resettlement, migration adaptation and adult learning attitudes using the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP 2014) human development classification system of different countries. 24…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, age and gender may also exert an influence. For example, internationally educated female health professionals appear to struggle more so than men [15, 33]. Individual characteristics influence routes (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less research exists on the process between an educational intervention and/or recertification and employment, although available findings indicate that MPs struggle to find employment [8, 15]. One barrier to entering the labour market for migrants is discrimination [8, 16–20], especially for those from non-western countries [17–20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors pushing health workers to migrate include poor wages, limited opportunities for professional development, heavy workloads, economic instability, poorly funded health care systems, the burdens and risks of HIV/AIDS and safety concerns (Labonte, Packer, and Klassen, 2006;Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), 2001;Robinson and Carey, 2000;Thompson et al, 2017;WHO, 2006). Pull factors include better and more comfortable living and working conditions, higher wages and greater opportunities for advancement and promotion (Aiken et al, 2004;Buchan, 2002;Davda et al, 2018;WHO, 2006).…”
Section: Gender and Health Worker Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%