Migrations- und Integrationspolitik der Europäischen Union: Widersprüchliche Trends und ihre Hintergründe

Bendel, Petra

doi:10.1007/978-3-531-90454-2_5

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If they are included in analyses, they either are usually a variable in the politics stream (Bundgaard and Vrangbaek 2007 ;Nagel 2009 ) or are said to assume the role of policy entrepreneurs (Bendel 2006 ;Zahariadis 2008 ;Rüb 2009 ). However, we argue that limiting the role of interest groups to the politics stream may result in incomplete analyses of policy processes, since they can also be crucial actors in the problem and policy streams.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interest groups in multiple streams: specifying their involvement in the framework

Rozbicka

Spohr

2015

Policy Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although interests inhabit a central place in the multiple streams framework (MSF), interest groups have played only a minor role in theoretical and empirical studies until now. In Kingdon's original conception, organized interests are a key variable in the politics stream. Revisiting Kingdon's concept with a particular focus on interest groups and their activities-in different streams and at various levels-in the policy process, we take this argument further. In particular, we argue that specifying groups' roles in other streams adds value to the explanatory power of the framework. To do this, we look at how interest groups affect problems, policies, and politics. The influence of interest groups within the streams is explained by linking the MSF with literature on interest intermediation. We show that depending on the number of conditions and their activity level, interest groups can be involved in all three streams. We illustrate this in case studies reviewing labor market policies in Germany and chemicals regulation at the European level.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interest groups in multiple streams: specifying their involvement in the framework

Rozbicka

Spohr

2015

Policy Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since then, many other contributions have adopted this extension (cf. Bendel ; Brunner ; Zohlnhöfer & Herweg ), while later stages of the policy cycle are still neglected (for exceptions, see Exworthy et al. () and Ridde () regarding policy implementation; Geva‐May () regarding policy termination).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Theoretically refining the multiple streams framework: An introduction

Zohlnhöfer

Herweg

Rüb

2015

European J Political Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This introduction to the forum section on the Multiple Streams Framework (MSF) developed by John W. Kingdon argues that the conditions under which policy making takes place today increasingly resemble the assumptions upon which Kingdon built his lens. At the same time, while the framework is extremely successful with regard to citations and has been applied in various contexts that often differ remarkably from those for which the framework was originally developed, a systematic theoretical debate about the Multiple Streams Framework is still lacking. It is the intention to spark such a debate with this forum section.

show abstract

Die EU-Migrationspolitik: Exportschlager oder Neuorientierung?

Bendel¹

Die Genese Einer Union Der 27

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Migrations- und Integrationspolitik der Europäischen Union: Widersprüchliche Trends und ihre Hintergründe

Cited by 5 publications

References 12 publications

Interest groups in multiple streams: specifying their involvement in the framework

Interest groups in multiple streams: specifying their involvement in the framework

Theoretically refining the multiple streams framework: An introduction

Die EU-Migrationspolitik: Exportschlager oder Neuorientierung?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About