2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10623-017-0397-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miklós–Manickam–Singhi conjectures on partial geometries

Abstract: In this paper we give a proof of the Manickam-Miklós-Singhi (MMS) conjecture for some partial geometries. Specifically, we give a condition on partial geometries which implies that the MMS conjecture holds. Further, several specific partial geometries that are counterexamples to the conjecture are described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A stronger theorem along the same lines was proved in [8,Corollary 52]. Furthermore, in [5] the geometry of van Lint and Schrijver was listed as a counterexample to the Manickam-Miklós-Singhi conjecture for partial geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A stronger theorem along the same lines was proved in [8,Corollary 52]. Furthermore, in [5] the geometry of van Lint and Schrijver was listed as a counterexample to the Manickam-Miklós-Singhi conjecture for partial geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…A partial geometry pg(5, 5, 2) has v = 81 points and as many lines. We shall denote the geometry of van Lint and Schrijver by G = (P, L), where the set of lines L consists of 6-element subsets of the set of points P. Two constructions of G are given in [11], the first using cyclotomy in the finite field F 81 , and the second using the dual code of the repetition code in F 5 3 . The first construction does not essentially use multiplication in F 81 and we describe it here in purely linear algebraic terms.…”
Section: Construction Of the New Partial Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations