1960
DOI: 10.1007/bf00583421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mikroelektrodenuntersuchungen zur Konvergenz vestibul�rer und retinaler Afferenzen an einzelnen Neuronen des optischen Cortex der Katze

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1961
1961
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Connecting the GCM to the orientationally selective properties of single cortical units has the great advantage of providing a neurophysiological and neuroanatomical substrate for the four fundamental relations of the model stated above. However, it is clear that important aspects of the influence of line orientation on VPEL are processed at a level beyond which orientation sensitivity to lines is first expressed in primary visual cortex, V1: Although a substantial percentage of V1 neurons has been reported to be sensitive to vestibular input (Denny & Adorjani, 1972; Grüsser & Grüsser-Cornehls, 1960; Horn, Stechler, & Hill, 1972; Jung, Kornhuber, & Da Fonseca, 1963; Tomko, Barbaro, & Ali, 1981), as would be required for VPEL settings, receptive fields in V1 are no larger than about 3° (Hubel & Wiesel, 1974). On the other hand, the increase of summation of the VPEL influence with line length is exponential with a 15.1° space constant (Figure 14; Li & Matin, 1991c), and summation between two pitched-from-vertical lines horizontally separated by 50.3° is as great as summation of lines laid end to end (Matin & Li, 1989b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Connecting the GCM to the orientationally selective properties of single cortical units has the great advantage of providing a neurophysiological and neuroanatomical substrate for the four fundamental relations of the model stated above. However, it is clear that important aspects of the influence of line orientation on VPEL are processed at a level beyond which orientation sensitivity to lines is first expressed in primary visual cortex, V1: Although a substantial percentage of V1 neurons has been reported to be sensitive to vestibular input (Denny & Adorjani, 1972; Grüsser & Grüsser-Cornehls, 1960; Horn, Stechler, & Hill, 1972; Jung, Kornhuber, & Da Fonseca, 1963; Tomko, Barbaro, & Ali, 1981), as would be required for VPEL settings, receptive fields in V1 are no larger than about 3° (Hubel & Wiesel, 1974). On the other hand, the increase of summation of the VPEL influence with line length is exponential with a 15.1° space constant (Figure 14; Li & Matin, 1991c), and summation between two pitched-from-vertical lines horizontally separated by 50.3° is as great as summation of lines laid end to end (Matin & Li, 1989b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-latency (25± 200 ms) responses were observed in visual cortical (area 17) neurons following d.c. polarization of the labyrinth in paralyzed cats (encØphale-isolØ preparation; Grüsser et al 1959;Grüsser and Grüsser-Cornehls 1960).…”
Section: Vestibular Inputs To the Cerebral Cortexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responses of visual cortical (area 17) neurons to light flashes or moving visual stimuli were influenced by d.c. polarization of the labyrinth in paralyzed cats (encØp-hale-isolØ preparation; Grüsser et al 1959;Grüsser and Grüsser-Cornehls 1960). Using unanesthetized, paralyzed cats, Tomko et al (1981) examined the effects of 45 whole body tilt on receptive field properties of simple visual cortical neurons Wiesel 1959, 1962).…”
Section: Visual Cortexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His interest in this area stemmed from his early findings that the electrical polarization of the lateral labyrinth influences the activity of neurons in the cat's primary visual cortex Grüsser and Grüsser-Cornehls 1960). During polarization of the labyrinth, V1 neurons significantly increased their activity while decreasing the threshold to optic stimulations (Grüsser and Grüsser-Cornehls 1960).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His interest in this area stemmed from his early findings that the electrical polarization of the lateral labyrinth influences the activity of neurons in the cat's primary visual cortex Grüsser and Grüsser-Cornehls 1960). During polarization of the labyrinth, V1 neurons significantly increased their activity while decreasing the threshold to optic stimulations (Grüsser and Grüsser-Cornehls 1960). Grüsser Grüsser had a great interest in the mathematical characterization of his findings and from his early publications ) he compared properties of the retina, lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex in order to find how information is processed in the central nervous system (CNS) of the cat ) and frog (Grüsser and Grüsser-Cornehls 1968) and the efficiency of different codes (Eckhorn et al 1976).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%