“…[ 66 ] On the other hand, HNO 3 ‐MIL‐101(Cr) has reaction mixtures with molar ratios of Cr:H 2 BDC:HNO 3 :H 2 O = 1:1:1:277 [ 12,69,73,88 ] or 1:1:1:265. [ 18,31,72 ] The reaction conditions for HCl‐MIL‐101(Cr) and HNO 3 ‐MIL‐101(Cr) bear close semblance to the HF‐based syntheses at 200–220 °C for 8, [ 12,17,18,55,62,70,72,74 ] 10, [ 59,65,82 ] 12, [ 57,60,64,66,71 ] or even 15 h. [ 68,81,86,87 ] Reports suggest that using HCl instead of HF reduces the MIL‐101(Cr) particle sizes (e.g., decreasing from 500–1500 to 200–1200 nm) [ 17 ] whereas replacing HF with HNO 3 seems to increase MIL‐101(Cr) crystallite sizes (e.g., increasing from 560–1100 to 720–1490 nm). [ 31,69 ] Specifically, by lowering the pH of the reaction mixture, HNO 3 reduces the crystal nucleation speeds to form larger crystallites.…”