Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, 143 Scientific Results 1995
DOI: 10.2973/odp.proc.sr.143.236.1995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Milankovitch Cycles from Fourier Analysis of Logs from Sites 865 and 866

Abstract: Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Sites 865 and 866, at Allison and Resolution guyots, respectively, were logged during Leg 143. Shipboard analysis of recovered core materials indicated rhythmic repetition of shallowing-upwards facies, however, recovery at both sites averaged less than 16% (l%-2% in the shallow-water limestones). The original depth of the recovered core material was not known with certainty, which precluded visual quantification of Milankovitch cycles. The geophysical logs, which provided continuou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our sequence stratigraphy interpretations must be based on a single 10-cm diameter "outcrop" at each guyat. Comparison of the recovered lithologies with Formation Microscanner imagery of the corresponding cored intervals suggests that core recovery was preferentially from relatively homogenous, partially cemented wackestone-packstone, especially near the top of each 10-m cored interval [e.g., Cooper, 1995;Ogg, 1995]. Intervals of very low resistivity facies, such as poorly cemented to friable wackestone that characterized transgressive "deepening," tended to have negligible recovery, and very high resistivity facies, such well-cemented horizons that capped "sequences," probably shattered into unrecoverable pieces during drilling.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Sea Level Changes In Guyotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our sequence stratigraphy interpretations must be based on a single 10-cm diameter "outcrop" at each guyat. Comparison of the recovered lithologies with Formation Microscanner imagery of the corresponding cored intervals suggests that core recovery was preferentially from relatively homogenous, partially cemented wackestone-packstone, especially near the top of each 10-m cored interval [e.g., Cooper, 1995;Ogg, 1995]. Intervals of very low resistivity facies, such as poorly cemented to friable wackestone that characterized transgressive "deepening," tended to have negligible recovery, and very high resistivity facies, such well-cemented horizons that capped "sequences," probably shattered into unrecoverable pieces during drilling.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Sea Level Changes In Guyotmentioning
confidence: 99%