Mild catalytic pyrolysis of biomass for production of transportation fuels: a techno-economic analysis

Abstract

A techno-economic analysis of mild catalytic pyrolysis (CP) of woody biomass followed by upgrading of the partially deoxygenated pyrolysis liquid is performed to assess this pathway's economic feasibility for the production of hydrocarbon-based biofuels. The process achieves a fuel yield of 17.7 wt% and an energy conversion of 39%. Deoxygenation of the pyrolysis liquid requires 2.7 wt% hydrogen while saturation of aromatic rings in the pyrolysis liquid increases total hydrogen consumption to 6.4 wt%. Total project investment is $457 million with annual operating costs of $142 million for a 2000 metric ton per day facility. A minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) of $3.69/gal is estimated assuming 10% internal rate of return. Twentynine percent of the capital outlay is the result of including a co-generation system to consume heat generated from burning part of the off-gases from pyrolysis and upgrading and all of the coke during regeneration of catalysts. Forty-five percent of the MFSP arises from the cost of biomass feedstock. Hydrogen required for the upgrading process is generated using the balance of the process off-gases.The analysis reveals that an optimum design would include a cogeneration unit; however using natural gas for hydrogen generation is more favorable than using process off-gases as the feed. An uncertainty analysis indicates a probable fuel price of $3.03/gal, demonstrating the potential of the CP pathway as an alternative to petroleum-derived transportation fuels. AbstractA techno-economic analysis of mild catalytic pyrolysis (CP) of woody biomass followed by upgrading of the partially deoxygenated pyrolysis liquid is performed to assess this pathway's economic feasibility for the production of hydrocarbon-based biofuels. The process achieves a fuel yield of 17.7 wt% and an energy conversion of 39%. Deoxygenation of the pyrolysis liquid requires 2.7 wt% hydrogen while saturation of aromatic rings in the pyrolysis liquid increases total hydrogen consumption to 6.4 wt%.Total project investment is $457 million with annual operating costs of $142 million for a 2000 metric ton per day facility. A minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) of $3.69/gal is estimated assuming 10% internal rate of return. Twenty-nine percent of the capital outlay is the result of including a co-generation system to consume heat generated from burning part of the off-gases from pyrolysis and upgrading and all of the coke during regeneration of catalysts. Forty-five percent of the MFSP arises from the cost of biomass feedstock. Hydrogen required for the upgrading process is generated using the balance of the process off-gases.This is a manuscript of an article from Green Chemistry 16 (2014): 627, doi: 10.1039/C3GC41314D. Posted with permission. 2The analysis reveals that an optimum design would include a cogeneration unit; however using natural gas for hydrogen generation is more favorable than using process off-gases as the feed.An uncertainty analysis indicates a probable fuel price of $3.03/gal, demonstrating the potent...

A techno-economic review of thermochemical cellulosic biofuel pathways

“…This methodology fails to account for the magnitude, frequency, and compound nature of factor variation that is likely to be encountered by a commercial-scale thermochemical cellulosic biorefinery. Some recent TEAs have included uncertainty analyses of the pathways considered in the form of Monte Carlo simulations or Latin Hypercube Sampling as a means of quantifying the impact of simultaneous factor changes on the TEA result (Thilakaratne et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2013;Zhu et al, 2014). While superior to a sensitivity analysis, most of these uncertainty analyses employ factor probability distributions that are chosen arbitrarily.…”

Techno-economic analysis of transportation fuels from defatted microalgae via hydrothermal liquefaction and hydroprocessing

“…This analysis utilizes the same methodology as that used by Ref. [42] to estimate the product distribution of hydroprocessing. The model assumes that 85% of the oxygen in the bio-crude is removed as water, and the rest is removed as carbon dioxide.…”

“…This process employs a two-stage hydroprocessing unit where the first stage operates at mild conditions (200 C, 11.7 MPa) to stabilize the bio-crude, and the second stage operates at more severe conditions (400 C, 11.7 MPa) [42].…”

Techno-economic and uncertainty analysis of in situ and ex situ fast pyrolysis for biofuel production

“…TEA of catalytic fast pyrolysis has received growing interest in recent years in particular. Previous studies show that the minimum fuel-selling price (MFSP) of biofuel produced by pyrolysis can vary within a fairly large range ($0.5-$2.1 per liter) (Anex et al, 2010;Brown et al, 2013;Thilakaratne, 2014;Wright et al, 2010), which may be attributed to several reasons: (1) differences in system configurations, (2) variability in assumptions for parameter values, and (3) inconsistencies in approaches to address technical and market uncertainty (Brown and Wright, 2014).…”

“…Monte Carlo simulations generate parameter samples randomly to quantitatively analyze the output uncertainty level. Although there are numerous comparison studies that evaluate biomass to transportation fuel pathways, few have incorporated the use of stochastic simulations (Anex et al, 2010;Bridgwater et al, 2002;Brown and Wright, 2014;Swanson et al, 2010;Thilakaratne, 2014;Wright et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2013).…”