Dear Editor: As intensivists concerned in particular with the management of patients with oncologic and hematologic malignancies, we have read with great interest the recent review article by De las Peñas et al. on the management of hyponatremia in patients suffering from the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). The authors advocated treatment with tolvaptan, one of the two currently available vasopressin antagonists, in the setting of hospital day care units [1]. However, the findings were based on a very small number of patients. We therefore believe some additional comments are necessary. First, in our opinion, hyponatremia-defined as a plasma sodium level below 135 mmol/L-probably occurs much more frequently than indicated and is not exclusively related to cancer, especially in the elderly population, which exhibits comorbidities such as cardiovascular disorders and a multitude of concomitant medications. Darmon et al. studied an unselected population of 11,125 patients hospitalized in intensive care and found that 3047 patients (27.4 %) had mild to severe hyponatremia (defined as a sodium concentration <130 mmol/L), and 2258 patients (20.3 %) had borderline hyponatremia (defined as a sodium concentration <135 mmol/L) at the time of ICU admission-that is, hyponatremia was diagnosed for 47.7 % of the studied population [2]. Second, uncertainty persists concerning the diagnosis of SIADH. A 2014 European consensus-which was not mentioned in the paper-defined hyponatremia as one of the Bminor^diagnostic criteria for SIADH; this definition can be very helpful for the diagnosis of oncological patients (Table 1, adapted from [3]). However, it is important to note that these recommendations by the European Society of Endocrinology, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association do not refer specifically to cancer patients. Nevertheless, we believe that plasma uric acid concentrations should be measured systematically. The combination of hypouricemia and hyponatremia, especially in cancer patients, seems to have a significant positive predictive value for SIADH, eliminating the need for additional biochemical examinations, which are sometimes difficult to obtain for ambulatory patients [3][4][5]. Our third comment concerns the prognostic significance-albeit moderate-of hyponatremia. In a systematic review, Castillo et al. analyzed the effects of hyponatremia on cancer patient outcomes. It was identified as an independent risk factor of a poor outcome for small cell cancer patients in 6 of 13 trials [6]. It is unknown whether correcting hyponatremia has an effect on the prognosis for cancer patients. However, Darmon et al. studied an unselected population of patients hospitalized in intensive care and showed that, after controlling for confounding, persistent hyponatremia on day 3 was independently associated with a higher day-28 mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.31; 95 % confidence interval [95 % CI], 1.06-1.61) [...