1993
DOI: 10.1159/000462347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mild Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn due to Anti-Lewis^a

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar finding was also observed in this study, where conventional RBC phenotyping through the tube technique was found to be incapable of determining accurate Lewis phenotypes. Although the Lewis system is not considered to be of major interest in modern blood banking as Lewis antibodies have rarely been implicated in haemolytic transfusion reactions and haemolytic disease of the newborn, 14‐16 this system has been associated with a number of diseases, 11 and hence, the data must not be skewed due to the non‐genuine RBC phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar finding was also observed in this study, where conventional RBC phenotyping through the tube technique was found to be incapable of determining accurate Lewis phenotypes. Although the Lewis system is not considered to be of major interest in modern blood banking as Lewis antibodies have rarely been implicated in haemolytic transfusion reactions and haemolytic disease of the newborn, 14‐16 this system has been associated with a number of diseases, 11 and hence, the data must not be skewed due to the non‐genuine RBC phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 11 ] detected IgG anti-Le a in 12 of the 13 cord sera tested by kinetic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay indicating that the IgG anti-Le a antibodies do cross the placenta though they do not cause HDNB because of the low levels of Lewis antigens on fetal red cells. However, the mild HDNB due to anti-Le a [ 12 ] and anti-Le b [ 13 14 ] has been documented in literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%