2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mild hydrostatic pressure triggers oxidative responses in Escherichia coli

Abstract: Hydrostatic pressure is an important physical stimulus which can cause various responses in bacterial cells. The survival and cellular processes of Escherichia coli under hydrostatic pressures between 10 MPa and 110 MPa have been studied. However, understanding bacterial responses to moderately elevated pressure of up to 10 MPa is useful for a range of different applications including for example in smart and responsive materials. In this study, the genetic responses of E. coli K-12 MG1655 to 1 MPa pressure wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S2). This may have allowed this hpx - strain to escape the positive feedback cycle that hpx - cells experience, in which higher H 2 O 2 concentrations prevent Fur from effectively limiting iron uptake, more intracellular free iron then further exacerbates the damage done by the excess H 2 O 2 (38, 39). It is likely that this loss-of-function mutation is an adaptation, during laboratory culture, to the loss of Fur functionality caused by the oxidation of intracellular iron.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S2). This may have allowed this hpx - strain to escape the positive feedback cycle that hpx - cells experience, in which higher H 2 O 2 concentrations prevent Fur from effectively limiting iron uptake, more intracellular free iron then further exacerbates the damage done by the excess H 2 O 2 (38, 39). It is likely that this loss-of-function mutation is an adaptation, during laboratory culture, to the loss of Fur functionality caused by the oxidation of intracellular iron.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7002), Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 (S. elon), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aure) and Bacillus subtilis (B. subt) [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. The data were processed and annotated as outlined in the Materials and Methods section, using standard pipelines and publicly available software.…”
Section: Plos Computational Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MICP has recently been used to make sand cube samples (Fig. 24d), seeded with non-engineered bacteria and receiving nutrients through multiple and controlled directions [119,120]. Findings reported in [120] show that influencing factors on the cemented form is not restricted to the form of the cast (and hence topology of the pore spaces in soil-Fig.…”
Section: Microbial-induced Carbonate Precipitation (Micp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24a) that is saturated with water, all the nutrients that bacteria need present, along with bacterium E. Coli. that are engineered [119] to respond to pressure. When load is applied, the porewater pressure in the soil volume rises, and the bacteria respond to that pressure by initiating a process of calcium carbonate cementation.…”
Section: Engineered Biological Matters (Synthetic Biology)mentioning
confidence: 99%