2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-9946-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mild ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: one perspective from the USA

Abstract: Purpose To provide a perspective regarding mild ovarian stimulation, taking into account particular issues relevant in the United States Methods Literature review and editorial commentary Results Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF has some proven and some theoretical advantages over conventional stimulation, such as lower risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and lower cost per fresh IVF cycle. However, cumulative live birth rate, including transfers from fresh and frozen embryos, is likely to be lower with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further studies are warranted including data not available in SART CORS to identify subpopulations who may be at most risk for LBW in autologous fresh transfers, such as women with pre-conception hypertension or women who had a prior delivery of an infant with LBW. We propose that until further analyses are performed, consideration should be given to either milder ovarian stimulation (43, 44), cryopreservation of all embryos with subsequent conception via frozen embryo transfer (45), or single embryo transfer, especially in cases where the risk of LBW based on other maternal factors is high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies are warranted including data not available in SART CORS to identify subpopulations who may be at most risk for LBW in autologous fresh transfers, such as women with pre-conception hypertension or women who had a prior delivery of an infant with LBW. We propose that until further analyses are performed, consideration should be given to either milder ovarian stimulation (43, 44), cryopreservation of all embryos with subsequent conception via frozen embryo transfer (45), or single embryo transfer, especially in cases where the risk of LBW based on other maternal factors is high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there is evidence that superovulation may adversely affect embryo quality, possibly through interference with natural selection of the best quality oocytes or other repercussions of ovarian stimulation on oocyte, aneuploidy, or embryo quality (8, 1215). Given the potential for adverse consequences of ovarian stimulation on the endometrium, oocyte, or embryo, there is increasing interest in mild ovarian stimulation for IVF with the goal of retrieving a limited number of oocytes (15, 16). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At-home use of the MLPT could allow women to increase the frequency and the ease of accessing data regarding their potential pregnancy. Further research could establish a role for the MLPT as a supplement to clinic-based serum lab tests, potentially reducing costs and time burdens for both women and health care systems [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%