2018
DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201701237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mild Ring Contractions of Cyclobutanols to Cyclopropyl Ketones via Hypervalent Iodine Oxidation

Abstract: An iodine-mediated oxidative ring contraction of cyclobutanols has been developed. The reaction allows the synthesis of a wide range of aryl cyclopropyl ketones under mild and eco-friendly conditions. A variety of functional groups including aromatic or alkyl halides, ethers, esters, ketones, alkenes, and even aldehydes are nicely tolerated in the reaction. This is in contrast with traditional synthetic approaches for which poor functional group tolerance is often a problem. The practicality of the method is a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations, with triflic acid and triflic anhydride giving different products than the reaction of PhI=O with 2 TMS‐OTf, indicate that the intermediates generated in the TMS‐OTf reaction must differ. This is also consistent with reported reactions on the ring contraction of alcohol appended cyclobutanes where reaction of PhI(OAc) 2 with TMSOTf promoter gives a substantially different yield than the reaction of PhI(OAc) 2 or PhI=O with triflic anhydride as the promoter [6b] …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These observations, with triflic acid and triflic anhydride giving different products than the reaction of PhI=O with 2 TMS‐OTf, indicate that the intermediates generated in the TMS‐OTf reaction must differ. This is also consistent with reported reactions on the ring contraction of alcohol appended cyclobutanes where reaction of PhI(OAc) 2 with TMSOTf promoter gives a substantially different yield than the reaction of PhI(OAc) 2 or PhI=O with triflic anhydride as the promoter [6b] …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The reaction takes place via sequential three stages. After TMSOTf activates PhI(OAc) 2 to give PhI(OTf) 2 , [42][43][44][45] stage I generates an intermediate IM2 for the subsequent rearrangement process. The stage takes place by assembling PhI(OTf) 2 with E-3c to give EIM1, [46][47][48][49] followed by a MBH-like nucleophilic addition of 4-methylpyridine (denoted as Py) to an alkene carbon of EIM1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify our hypothesis,w ec ommenced the study by treating PhI(OTf) 2 (formed in situ by the addition of TMSOTf to PhI(OAc) 2 ) [10] with several nitrile nucleophiles ( Table 1). Simple nitrile 2 did not provide any desired product when treated with PhI(OTf) 2 (entry 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%