2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mild stimulation for in vitro fertilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The perceived needs and interests of our patients change too. Examples of treatment approaches that were introduced to meet perceived patient demand that changed by the time an acceptable evidence base had been generated include egg sharing (Ahuja et al, 1999), now increasingly replaced by egg banking, and mild stimulation approaches (Nargund et al, 2017), the espoused safety advantages of which are now widely considered to be met by GnRH agonist triggering, freeze-all cycles and single embryo transfer. Other criticisms of RCTs that have been well rehearsed elsewhere include the risk that imposing narrow inclusion criteria will limit the applicability of the findings to a broader patient population, whereas permitting broader inclusion criteria means individual variation in response to the studied intervention may be so great as to mask any effect.…”
Section: Why Is the Evidence Still Missing?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perceived needs and interests of our patients change too. Examples of treatment approaches that were introduced to meet perceived patient demand that changed by the time an acceptable evidence base had been generated include egg sharing (Ahuja et al, 1999), now increasingly replaced by egg banking, and mild stimulation approaches (Nargund et al, 2017), the espoused safety advantages of which are now widely considered to be met by GnRH agonist triggering, freeze-all cycles and single embryo transfer. Other criticisms of RCTs that have been well rehearsed elsewhere include the risk that imposing narrow inclusion criteria will limit the applicability of the findings to a broader patient population, whereas permitting broader inclusion criteria means individual variation in response to the studied intervention may be so great as to mask any effect.…”
Section: Why Is the Evidence Still Missing?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Final oocyte maturation is triggered by administration of human chorionic gonadotropin, GnRH agonists, or both. 11,12 After COS, OPU is carried out to be fertilized with sperm cells in vitro.…”
Section: In Vitro Fertilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional vs mild stimulation With the mild ovarian stimulation (MOS) approach, clinicians focus on optimizing patient care rather than obtaining the highest yield of oocytes, by minimizing treatment burden and risk of complications. MOS is associated with a greater safety profile in terms of the incidence of OHSS and of venous thromboembolism (Nargund et al 2017). It is also found to be better tolerated by patients (Verberg et al 2008) and less expensive (Nargund et al 2017).…”
Section: Stimulation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MOS is associated with a greater safety profile in terms of the incidence of OHSS and of venous thromboembolism (Nargund et al 2017). It is also found to be better tolerated by patients (Verberg et al 2008) and less expensive (Nargund et al 2017). Given that two meta-analyses of RCTs in normal responders demonstrated a lower number of retrieved oocytes in MOS (Verberg et al 2009a,b, Matsaseng et al 2013, it is not a strategy recommended for patients undergoing a PGT cycle.…”
Section: Stimulation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%