2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-812012-5.00022-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries and Object Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined with our observation that abnormal neuronal activity developed 7 days after the injury ( Figure 8 ), it is possible that changes in fear conditioning test might result from excess mPFC activity after rmTBI. Our finding of impaired novel object recognition ( Figure 7 ) concurs with others who have used it to show memory deficit and impaired recognition memory after mTBI ( Morawska et al, 2016 ; Qubty et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combined with our observation that abnormal neuronal activity developed 7 days after the injury ( Figure 8 ), it is possible that changes in fear conditioning test might result from excess mPFC activity after rmTBI. Our finding of impaired novel object recognition ( Figure 7 ) concurs with others who have used it to show memory deficit and impaired recognition memory after mTBI ( Morawska et al, 2016 ; Qubty et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The acute response of brain tissue to a mechanical insult results in ongoing pathology and neurologic outcomes that appear weeks or months following the initial injury (Bramlett and Dietrich, 2015), including diffuse axonal injury (Johnson et al, 2013) and accumulation of amyloid precursor protein (Collins et al, 2020). Furthermore, multiple reports identify mitochondrial dysfunction following mTBI (Vagnozzi et al, 2007;Johnson et al, 2013;Fischer et al, 2016;Kim et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%