Militarism and the environment in Guatemala

Abstract

This paper examines how civil war in Guatemala created and destroyed community cohesion, which, in turn, influences land use practices in the frontier region of Ixcán today. The impact of civil war on the environment and land use in this region takes many forms. Some communities took refuge in Mexico. Other communities refused to take refuge in Mexico and also refused to submit to military rule. These communities of ''people in resistance'' formed highly cohesive units in order to evade military detection. The lessons of cooperation and the high levels of cohesion they developed during their years in hiding have carried over to their successful management of natural resources in post-conflict Guatemala. Return refugees accumulated higher levels of cohesion while in refuge because they often participated in workshops organized and funded by outside relief agencies. Higher levels of community cohesion have allowed return refugee communities to better organize and use their land in more sustainable ways. Other communities did not flee and thus endured military rule. They were forced out of their dispersed land parcels into concentrated model villages. Concentration of community members forced intensive use of the environment in the zone immediately surrounding the new settlement. Often, distrust permeated these occupied communities and community cohesion dipped. Today, these low levels of community cohesion lead to a lack of consensus on how to use land and resources in the community. The overall goal of the paper is to point out the community level variation in the relationship between military actions, community cohesion, and the environment.

Land and leña: linking transnational migration, natural resources, and the environment in Guatemala

“…In the Guatemalan case explored here land ties Maya migrants abroad and those at home in complex ways to an intimate and significant heritage. Human relationships with the land, however, alter (and even fragment) due to economic-related migration, population pressure, and Popul Environ (2010) 32:198-215 211 political and economic factors that unfold at different scales from local to macro (Taylor et al 2006;Taylor 2007). To flee grinding poverty, the rigid hierarchical structures that govern the country, and limited access to resources thousands of Guatemalans migrate north.…”

“Blind passes” and the production of green security through violence on the Guatemalan border

“…The borderlands are places for ''hidden wars'' (Manz, 1988), places that are historically ''unpopulated,'' ''remote,'' ''periphery'' (Taylor, 2007), and even ''unknown to Guatemalans'' (IDS, 1961). While some scholars employ these terms in solidarity with homesteaders who suffered massacres during the civil war, they nonetheless contribute to the production of an imaginary of a remote, dangerous, ungovernable frontier that is marked by ''blind passes'' where people and drugs transgress borders.…”

Student Learning in Guatemala: An Untenured Faculty Perspective on International Service Learning and Public Good

“…In the first phase, Catholic church-sponsored cooperatives of Ixcán directly contrasted with the traditional model of life in rural Guatemala in which poor farmers lived in the economic and social shadows of the state and operated on the margins of the national economy. In contrast, cooperatives in Ixcán established something unheard of in Guatemala's countrysidegenuine socioeconomic development for Guatemala's poor (Taylor 2007).…”