Military Capabilities and Escalation: A Correction to Bueno de Mesquita, Morrow, and Zorick

Molinari, Maria Cristina

doi:10.2307/2586021

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Do the required readings cover a mix of female and male authors (and other demographic categories)? My own web searches for graduate‐level syllabi suggest that it is quite common, for example, for the 1997 Bueno de Mesquita, Morrow, and Zorick paper to be on a reading list, but not Molinari's correction (which would seem to be even more important for graduate training than the flawed original); and for sections on alliances to not mention a single paper by Ashley Leeds. Habitually checking our syllabi to ensure they are representative helps ensure subsequent generations of scholars will better value women's contributions to knowledge, both because students become aware of women's work and because their mentors foster an environment in which that work is deemed important.…”

Section: Self‐reflectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Social Underpinnings of Women's Worth in the Study of World Politics: Culture, Leader Emergence, and Coauthorship

Kadera

2013

Int Stud Perspect

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using personal observations and the results from a variety of studies on gender and scholarship, this paper demonstrates that our discipline often holds women's research in lower esteem. It does so by examining gendered patterns in various cultures of academic life, the processes by which intellectual leaders emerge, and coauthorship as one of the most significant social activities undertaken by researchers. Solutions at all institutional levels—professional organizations, journals, grant organizations, universities and colleges, graduate colleges, departments—are suggested. And even well‐intentioned individuals, in a variety of roles—departmental leaders, panel organizers, discussants, bloggers, instructors, mentors, colleagues, authors, and journalists—must be willing to examine and change their own practices. The result is win‐win: valuing women's research is better for female and male academics, students' intellectual health, the strength of colleges and universities, and the long‐run vitality of professional organizations and journals.

show abstract

Section: Self‐reflectionmentioning

confidence: 99%