2006
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-34576-0_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Military Families and the Armed Forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Important intrapersonal coping skills for wives have also been identified, including optimism in general (Padden, 2006) and a positive attitude toward the military specifically (Johnson et al., 2007). Furthermore, using the deployment as a time of personal development (Klein et al., 1988), taking responsibility for personal preparedness (Weins & Boss, 2006), channeling anxiety into other activities (Figley, 1993a), and developing a routine (Moelker & van der Kloet, 2006) are important means of promoting positive coping. Finally, in order to promote positive intrapersonal and interpersonal coping, Weins and Boss have effectively argued that therapists working with military families need to focus on the particular family’s internal and external contexts.…”
Section: The Deployment Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important intrapersonal coping skills for wives have also been identified, including optimism in general (Padden, 2006) and a positive attitude toward the military specifically (Johnson et al., 2007). Furthermore, using the deployment as a time of personal development (Klein et al., 1988), taking responsibility for personal preparedness (Weins & Boss, 2006), channeling anxiety into other activities (Figley, 1993a), and developing a routine (Moelker & van der Kloet, 2006) are important means of promoting positive coping. Finally, in order to promote positive intrapersonal and interpersonal coping, Weins and Boss have effectively argued that therapists working with military families need to focus on the particular family’s internal and external contexts.…”
Section: The Deployment Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, social relationships or the lack of them have been identified, respectively, as a protective or risk factor for health. The beneficial effects of supportive social relationships in decreasing the impact of stress and increasing adaptation and resilience have been well-documented in literature (Bowen, Martin, Mancini, & Nelson, 2000;Cutrona & Russell, 1987;House, Landis, & Umberson, 1988;Moelker & Van der Kloet, 2003;Palmer, 2008;Patterson, 2003;Unger & Powell, 1980). Furthermore, various studies have demonstrated perceived social isolation (i.e., feeling a lack of meaningful relationships) to be negatively correlated with health or well-being.…”
Section: Social Isolationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Considerable research has been conducted on U.S. military families in the past 20 years (see Castro, Adler, and Britt 2006;Martin, Rosen, and Sparacino 2000 for reviews of the most recent research) and, more recently, on European, Korean, and Israeli military families (see Moelker and van der Kloet 2003). Much of the early research focused on a co-residing traditional nuclear family consisting of male soldier, female spouse, and children.…”
Section: Soldiers Military Families and Communicationmentioning
confidence: 97%