Civil Society in British History 2003
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199260201.003.0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Military Service Tribunals: Civil Society in Action, 1916–1918

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In May 1916 mandatory military service was extended to married men of the same age range. The purpose of military service tribunals was to hear appeals against conscription (Gregory, 2003). Those seeking exemption from military service would first apply to their local military tribunal, of which there were 1,800 in Great Britain.…”
Section: Sources and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In May 1916 mandatory military service was extended to married men of the same age range. The purpose of military service tribunals was to hear appeals against conscription (Gregory, 2003). Those seeking exemption from military service would first apply to their local military tribunal, of which there were 1,800 in Great Britain.…”
Section: Sources and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 1.2 million men deemed to have enlisted under the 1916 Act, 750,000 applied for exemption (McDermott, 2011: 24). It has been estimated that military service tribunals heard at least 1.25 million cases from 1916 to 1918, the years of conscription (Gregory, 2003).…”
Section: Sources and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…113 Even before this, the Military Service Tribunals set up to hear individual appeals against conscription frequently took personal circumstances into account in their deliberations, much as the Liberal conscriptionists had urged. 114 At its boldest, the Liberal case for conscription portrayed military service as just one plank in a broader programme of progressive wartime state collectivism. Many Liberals who came to support conscription during the war -and particularly those who emerged from the left of the pre-1914 party -were also prominent advocates of a wartime ' conscription of wealth '.…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%