2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.1813-6982.2002.tb00045.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Military Spending, Investment and Economic Growth in Small Industrialising Economies

Abstract: THE ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF MILITARY spending have been debated over a number of years. Since Benoit ( 1973) suggested that military expenditure had a positive impact on development, a large body of empirical literature has developed, looking at cross country studies and time series case studies of individual economies, without achieving any clear consensus. The results do suggest that military expenditure has a negative impact on growth in advanced economies through it being at the expense of investment, but ther… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The seminal work of Benoit (1973Benoit ( , 1978 has spurred an increasing attention on the economic impact of defence spending with the relevant literature steadily expanding ever since (inter alia : Chowdhury, 1991;Dakurah et al, 2001;Sezgin, 2001;Atesoglu, 2002;Dunne et al, 2002;Abu-Bader and Abu-Qarm, 2003;Cuaresma and Reitschuler, 2004;Halicioglu, 2004;Bas, 2005;Yildirim et al, 2005;Kollias et al, 2007;Lee and Chen, 2007;Özsoy, 2008;Wijeweera and Webb, 2009). Broadly speaking, the findings are mixed and inconclusive with results depending on the country or sample of countries, the time period or the methodology used (for a survey of the findings and the issues see Dunne et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The seminal work of Benoit (1973Benoit ( , 1978 has spurred an increasing attention on the economic impact of defence spending with the relevant literature steadily expanding ever since (inter alia : Chowdhury, 1991;Dakurah et al, 2001;Sezgin, 2001;Atesoglu, 2002;Dunne et al, 2002;Abu-Bader and Abu-Qarm, 2003;Cuaresma and Reitschuler, 2004;Halicioglu, 2004;Bas, 2005;Yildirim et al, 2005;Kollias et al, 2007;Lee and Chen, 2007;Özsoy, 2008;Wijeweera and Webb, 2009). Broadly speaking, the findings are mixed and inconclusive with results depending on the country or sample of countries, the time period or the methodology used (for a survey of the findings and the issues see Dunne et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, since the end of the cold war, data quality and leverage has improved and the developments of panel data techniques has helped overcome limited exogenous variation in the data (Dunne, Nikolaidou, and Smith, 2002;Dunne, Smith, and Willenbockel, 2004). Panel data methods such as simple fixed effects, random effects and random coefficient estimators have been increasingly used and as longer time-series data becomes available dynamic specifications have been introduced into panel data methods .…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are some studies which argue in support of the positive growth effects of military spending. In his seminal works, Benoit (1973Benoit ( , 1978 show The second group of studies point out the negative growth effects of military spending through different channels such as lower saving rates and investment, reduction of other productive spending (health and education), higher budget deficit, higher debt, increase of corruption, higher tax rates and lower productivity of private sector and lower capital formation and resource extraction (see, for example, Deger 1986;Chan 1988;Lebovic and Ishaq, 1987;Mintz and Huang, 1990;Scheetz, 1991;Asseery, 1996;Dunne and Vougas, 1999;Gupta et al, 2001;and Dunne et al, 2002). Chowdhury (1991) examines the Granger causality between military spending and economic growth for the 55 developing countries.…”
Section: -Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%