State of Authority 2019
DOI: 10.7591/9781501719448-004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Milk Coffee at 10 Am: Encountering the State Through Pllkada in North Sumatra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The character of these direct elections for district heads ( bupati or, in cities, walikota ) and governors are the focus of this article. Some observers consider these elections to be highly clientelistic, dubbing Indonesia a “patronage democracy” ( Nordholt & van Klinken, 2007 ; Simandjuntak, 2009 ; van Klinken, 2009 ) run by “predatory elites” ( Hadiz, 2010 ; Winters, 2011 ). Others have argued that an increasingly vocal civil society is using newly gained civil liberties to curtail clientelistic practices ( Mietzner, 2012 ; Stanley, Priyono, & Törnquist, 2004 ).…”
Section: Indonesia’s Patronage Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The character of these direct elections for district heads ( bupati or, in cities, walikota ) and governors are the focus of this article. Some observers consider these elections to be highly clientelistic, dubbing Indonesia a “patronage democracy” ( Nordholt & van Klinken, 2007 ; Simandjuntak, 2009 ; van Klinken, 2009 ) run by “predatory elites” ( Hadiz, 2010 ; Winters, 2011 ). Others have argued that an increasingly vocal civil society is using newly gained civil liberties to curtail clientelistic practices ( Mietzner, 2012 ; Stanley, Priyono, & Törnquist, 2004 ).…”
Section: Indonesia’s Patronage Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also has a distinctive bearing on subjects' relations to themselves and to others, inflecting all aspects of social life. A classic liberal democracy, for example, affords a form of sociality in which members can and do disagree publicly (Long 2006), where they periodically enjoy the thrill (or the burden) of evaluating what kind of person they would most like to be in authority over them (Simandjuntak 2009), and where individual citizens discipline themselves (and each other) to obey the law and fulfil their obligations towards the state (Cruikshank 1999). All these relations are part of the same dynamic system -which is why we find it helpful to talk of democracy as a 'total way of life' rather than simply a political principle or administrative technique.…”
Section: Democracy Sociality and Subjectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%