1999
DOI: 10.1086/312026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Milliarcsecond Change of IM Pegasi Radio Position in 1 Hour Coincident with Sharp Rise in Flux Density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On occasion, time-resolved images show variations in morphology over several hours. As we have mentioned, apparent motion of IM Peg's emission region, correlated with evolution of its flux density on timescales of 1 hr, is definitely seen in our 1997 January 16 session (Lebach et al 1999), and may be present in at least two of our other observing sessions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On occasion, time-resolved images show variations in morphology over several hours. As we have mentioned, apparent motion of IM Peg's emission region, correlated with evolution of its flux density on timescales of 1 hr, is definitely seen in our 1997 January 16 session (Lebach et al 1999), and may be present in at least two of our other observing sessions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…A rapid change in the apparent position accompanied by a large change in flux density is seen in several sessions. The most dramatic example was the already mentioned change in apparent position of ∼0.9 mas over a period of 1.4 hr on 1997 January 16 (see Lebach et al 1999). Such a change in apparent position could be due either to (1) fast motion at ∼1000 km s −1 of flare-energized 11 As we mention in Section 3.5 above, the systematic uncertainty on the average angle of elongation of the radio emission likely dominates the statistical one of ±7 • .…”
Section: Rapid Evolution Of the Radio Structurementioning
confidence: 91%
“…We suspect that the two radio components seen in all three maps correspond to two regions near the 1M Peg primary, which has of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0074180900221359 an estimated angular diameter of 1.3 mas (Lebach et al 1999). Alternatively, one of the radio components could correspond to a region near the primary and the other to a region near the secondary, which to date is optically undetected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our first session of VLBI observations, made on 1997 January 16-17, revealed an apparent motion in the radio position of 1M Peg of about 0.9 mas over VLBI Imaging and A strometry of 1M Peg 319 a 1.4 h period in which there was also a dramatic rise in flux density (Lebach et al 1999). Such position changes are more rapid than can be explained by proper motion, parallax, and orbital motion and thus suggest physical evolution of the stellar radio emission on hour and even sub hour time scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The largest source of scatter is likely a highly variable spatial offset between the stellar radio emission and the center of the primary component of the IM Peg binary. The strongest evidence for this assertion is that, for some of those VLBI sessions marked by emission strong enough to be detectable in single scans, our VLBI astrometry reveals changes in position of up to ∼1 mas occurring in synchrony with changes in the brightness of the emission (Lebach et al 1999). In addition, it is plausible that the radio emission is both powered and loosely confined by the stellar magnetic field (Franciosini & Chiuderi Drago 1995).…”
Section: Estimated Positions and Their Errorsmentioning
confidence: 87%