2016 IEEE 27th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2016.7794731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Millimeter-wave channel model parameters for urban microcellular environment based on 28 and 38 GHz measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality of the prediction is on average similar to the other frequency, and the contribution of diffuse scattering is equally—if not more—decisive. This is in agreement with previous studies that found propagation at the two very same frequencies to show very similar characteristics (Park et al, ). Tables and summarize the prediction errors in Tangfei Scenario for both frequencies, when scattering is included (Table ) and not included (Table ) in the ray‐tracing tool.…”
Section: Measurement and Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quality of the prediction is on average similar to the other frequency, and the contribution of diffuse scattering is equally—if not more—decisive. This is in agreement with previous studies that found propagation at the two very same frequencies to show very similar characteristics (Park et al, ). Tables and summarize the prediction errors in Tangfei Scenario for both frequencies, when scattering is included (Table ) and not included (Table ) in the ray‐tracing tool.…”
Section: Measurement and Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Considerable effort has been spent in recent years in the characterization of mm‐wave propagation, both in indoor (Ai et al, ; Fuschini et al, ; Inomata, Imai, et al, ; Inomata, Sasaki, et al, ; Cheng et al, ; Huang et al, ; Nielsen & Pedersen, ; Karstensen et al, ) and in outdoor scenarios (Rappaport, Xing, et al, ; Sun et al, ; Weiler et al, ; Rappaport, MacCartney, et al, ; Rappaport et al, ; Leonor et al, ; Solomitckii et al, ; Zhong et al, ; Park et al, ; Hur et al, ). Among the latter, some papers are comprehensive surveys on mm‐wave communications (Rappaport, Xing, et al, ) or on mm‐wave propagation models for 5G systems (Rappaport et al, ); others deal with narrowband path‐loss or shadowing models (Rappaport, MacCartney, et al, ; Weiler et al, ) or with wideband mm‐wave models (Rappaport et al, ; Hur et al, ; Park et al, ). Very few papers address peculiar characteristic of outdoor mm‐wave propagation such as the effect of vegetation and of diffuse scattering and their modeling in ray‐tracing (RT) tools (Solomitckii et al, ; Leonor et al, ; Mani et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results proved, explicitly, that accounting for the number of beams (or discrete angles) combined at the Rx could result in receiving a strong signal power. An approach in [59] studied the urban microcell wideband measurement at 28 and 38 GHz by using a channel sounder equipped with an omnidirectional and steerable directional antenna. This study characterized various small-and large-scale parameters, such as angular speed, shadow fading, delay spread path loss, and clustering, in order to determine the potential of mmWave frequencies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [8] and [9] provide results in various cities in Korea, while [10] reports channel measurements conducted at 32 GHz on a University campus in Beijing, China. All these environments are densely built up, with highrise buildings (≥ 5 floors and/or contiguous facades).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%