2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12127-014-0149-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MIMA—a software for analyte identification in MCC/IMS chromatograms by mapping accompanying GC/MS measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approaches for aligning GC/MS and MCC/IMS spectra have been recently described 10, 7274 including some specific software (MIMA an MS-IMS-Mapper) 74, 75 .…”
Section: Hyphenated Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches for aligning GC/MS and MCC/IMS spectra have been recently described 10, 7274 including some specific software (MIMA an MS-IMS-Mapper) 74, 75 .…”
Section: Hyphenated Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten millilitres of exhaled air (every 20 min) was retained in the sample loop before it entered the MCC of the IMS instrument. The retention time in relation to the preseparation of the MCC, the drift time of the ions within the IMS instrument, and the intensity of the analytes were provided by MCC-IMS and were subsequently identified using the BS-MCC/IMS-Analytes database (version 1209) in combination with the program MIMA [21]. VOCs were identified using the program Visual Now 3.1 (B & S Analytik, Dortmund, Germany).…”
Section: Mcc-ims Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preseparation of volatile acetone by multicapillary columns resulted in compound retention time (RT), analysis by ion-mobility spectrometry in drift time (1/K0). Acetone monomers and dimers were identified in the chromatogram by Visual Now 3.6 (B&S Analytik, Dortmund, Germany) and comparison with an existing database (BS-MCC/IMS-analytes database, version 1209, B&S Analytik, Dortmund, Germany) [ 11 ] as well as pure substance measurements. Intensity of total volatile acetone was calculated:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%